author | SoSoValue
On July 23, 2024, the U.S. Ethereum spot ETF was officially listed and traded, which is exactly 10 years since the first public sale of Ethereum on July 22, 2014. Whether the listing date of the Ethereum ETF was deliberately chosen at this memorable moment or just a coincidence, this event will have epic significance for the future sustainable development of the entire crypto world, because it is an important step for the POS public chain to enter the mainstream financial world, which will surely attract more dimensions and numbers of builders to join the construction of the Ethereum ecosystem, and pave the way for subsequent crypto world infrastructure such as Solana to enter the mainstream world, which has substantial significance for the popularization of the blockchain ecosystem.
On the other hand, since Ethereum ETFs do not currently allow staking from a regulatory perspective, investors holding ETFs will receive 3%-5% less staking mining income (the risk-free rate of return in the Ethereum world) than directly holding Ethereum tokens. In addition, the threshold for general investors to understand Ethereum is higher than that for Bitcoin . Therefore, the short-term impact of this US Ethereum spot ETF on the Ethereum price may not be as great as the short-term impact of the Bitcoin spot ETF on the BTC price after its approval. It will more likely increase the relative stability of the Ethereum price and reduce volatility.
The following article will analyze the short-term impact on the power of Ethereum token buyers and sellers after the listing of the Ethereum spot ETF, and the long-term impact on the crypto ecosystem.
1. In the short term: The power of both buyers and sellers is not as strong as that of Bitcoin ETF, and the impact of Ethereum ETF is expected to be smaller than that of Bitcoin
According to SoSoValue's continuous tracking of Bitcoin spot ETFs, the factor that has the greatest impact on the price of the currency is the daily net inflow, that is, the actual increase in the buying/selling volume brought to the crypto world by the cash subscription and redemption of Bitcoin spot ETFs (see Figure 1 for details), which affects supply and demand and determines the price. According to the S-1 document, the subscription and redemption mechanism of the US Ethereum spot ETF is the same as that of the Bitcoin spot ETF, and both only support cash subscription and redemption. Therefore, the daily net inflow will also be the most important observation indicator of the Ethereum spot ETF; there are two main differences:
Selling: Due to the more than 10 times difference in management fees of Grayscale Ethereum Trust (stock code ETHE), the selling effect brought about by the relocation effect is still there; and after experiencing the Bitcoin mistake caused by the outflow of Grayscale GBTC, the market is also prepared for the outflow of Grayscale ETHE. However, unlike the Bitcoin ETF, the Grayscale Ethereum Trust split 10% of its net assets to establish a low-fee Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (stock code ETH) during the conversion process to an ETF, so the selling may be slightly reduced.
Buying: Since Ethereum ETF does not allow staking from a regulatory perspective, holding Ethereum ETF will result in 3%-5% less staking mining income (risk-free rate of return in the Ethereum world) than directly holding Ethereum tokens; at the same time, the general public's awareness of Ethereum is lower than that of Bitcoin . If they are optimistic about cryptocurrencies, they will still prefer Bitcoin ETFs, which have a clear scarcity and only 21 million units, for allocation.
Figure 1: Decomposition of the impact of net outflows on Bitcoin prices in the initial stage of Ethereum spot ETF listing
1. Selling: Grayscale ETHE with a management fee of 10 times of its competitors with a value of $9.2 billion will still bring early selling, but the impact will be smaller than that of GBTC outflow.
Looking back at the reasons for the large net outflow in the early days of Grayscale Bitcoin ETF (GBTC), there are two reasons: on the one hand, the management fee was significantly higher than that of competitors, which brought about a moving effect. Investors redeemed from Grayscale Bitcoin ETF with a management fee of 1.5% and bought other ETFs with a management fee of about 0.2%; on the other hand, the previous trust discount arbitrage was sold after the ETF price was flattened. At the beginning of the year, the ETF (GBTC asset management scale of US$28.4 billion) directly converted from Grayscale Bitcoin Trust saw a continuous large-scale net outflow of funds as soon as it was listed. There are two main reasons. First, Grayscale GBTC's management fee rate is 1.5%, which is about 6 times that of its competitors, causing investors who are optimistic about Bitcoin assets in the long term to move their positions to other ETFs; second, before GBTC was converted to ETF, the discount remained at around 20% for a long time, stimulating investors to arbitrage the discount rate by purchasing discounted GBTC and shorting BTC over the counter. After the discount of the trust conversion to ETF basically disappeared, this type of arbitrage funds sold the ETF and took profits. According to SoSoValue data, GBTC's net outflow lasted from January 11 to May 2, and then slowed down, during which time its Bitcoin holdings decreased by 53%.
Figure 2: Net outflow of GBTC since its listing
Unlike the direct conversion of GBTC, Grayscale will simultaneously split 10% of its net assets to establish a low-fee Ethereum Mini ETF (stock code ETH) during the conversion of the Ethereum Trust to an ETF. That is, Grayscale will have two Ethereum ETFs with management fees of 2.5% and 0.15% respectively, which slightly alleviates the pressure of outflow caused by high fees. According to the S-1 document, the Grayscale Ethereum Trust (stock code: ETHE) will transfer about 10% of Ethereum to the Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (stock code: ETH) as the initial funds for the Mini Trust ETH; after that, the two Grayscale Ethereum ETFs will operate independently. For investors who already hold ETHE, on July 23, each share of Ethereum Trust ETHE they hold will automatically be allocated 1 share of Ethereum Mini Trust ETH, and the net value of ETHE will be adjusted to 90% of the previous amount. Considering that the management fee rate of ETHE is 2.5% and the management fee rate of ETH Mini Trust is 0.15% (free of management fee within 2 billion USD in the first 6 months), that is to say, for existing ETHE investors, 10% of their assets will be automatically allocated to low-fee ETFs. With reference to the final fund transfer ratio of GBTC being around 50%, it is expected that the spin-off and launch of Ethereum Mini Trust ETH and the early bird discount of management fee will ease the short-term fund outflow pressure of Grayscale ETHE.
On the other hand, because the ETHE discount converged ahead of time, the outflow pressure caused by the liquidation of discounted arbitrage positions is also expected to be smaller than that of GBTC. Grayscale ETHE was once greatly discounted, with a discount of up to 60% at the end of 2022, and a discount of more than 20% in April-May 2024, but the discount began to converge to 1%-2% at the end of May, and converged to less than 1% in July; while GBTC’s discount rate remained at 6.5% 2 days before its conversion to ETF (January 9). Therefore, for arbitrageurs, the motivation for ETHE to take profits is greatly reduced.
Figure 3: Ethereum spot ETF fee comparison
Figure 4: Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETHE Historical Discount
2. Buying power from the stock market: The public consensus on Ethereum is far less than that on Bitcoin, and the asset allocation momentum is less than BTC spot ETF
For the general public investors, the logic of Bitcoin is simple and easy to understand, and the consensus has been reached: the gold in the digital world has a clear scarcity and a total of 21 million coins, so it fits their existing investment framework very well; while Ethereum, as the largest basic public chain, has a relatively complex mining mechanism, and its development is affected by multiple forces in the ecosystem. The most important thing is the supply quantity as an investment target, which involves inflation and deflation at all times. The calculation process is dynamic and complex, and the cognitive threshold is high, which is difficult for ordinary investors to understand intuitively. In short, on the one hand, from the supply perspective, Ethereum has an unlimited supply in principle. Under the latest POS mechanism, the staking income brought by block rewards drives its supply to increase, and the user transaction gas fee burning affected by the on-chain ecological activity drives its supply to decrease, thereby forming a dynamic supply and demand balance mechanism; the latest supply is about 120 million coins, and the recent annualized inflation rate is 0.6%-0.8%. On the other hand, from the conventional fundamental perspective, as a public chain, it faces competition from other public chains, and the general public investors do not have faith in the final outcome of the competition. There are public chain ecosystems such as Solana and Ton on the market, which are also known to the general public investors. However, if we analyze their competitiveness in detail, the threshold for general public investors is extremely high. Therefore, if ordinary investors are optimistic about the investment value of cryptocurrencies, they may still prefer to configure Bitcoin spot ETFs with scarce supply and no competition.
Public data also shows that there is a significant difference in popularity between Ethereum ETF and Bitcoin ETF. Comparing the popularity of Google searches, which represents the public's attention, Ethereum is only about 1/5 of Bitcoin (see Figure 5 for details); and observing the seed funds (generally funded by fund managers/underwriters) issued by this Ethereum ETF, the seed fund size of Fidelity's Ethereum ETF (stock code FETH) is only 1/4 of its Bitcoin ETF (stock code FBTC), and other issuers such as VanEck and Invesco also have a large gap (see Figure 6 for details).
Figure 5: Comparison of Google search popularity for Bitcoin and Ethereum
Figure 6: Comparison of seed fund size of Ethereum ETF and Bitcoin ETF under the same issuer
3. Buying from the crypto community: Due to the lack of a 3%-5% basic staking yield on the ETH chain, demand is basically non-existent
Crypto investors also contributed to some of the buying of Bitcoin spot ETFs, mainly due to the need for proof of real-world assets. Crypto investors holding Bitcoin ETFs only need to pay an annual fee of 0.2%-0.25% to have proof of assets in the traditional financial market, which is convenient for economic life in the mass world, balancing financial assets and Bitcoin holdings, and using this to conduct various leverage operations, such as mortgage lending, building structured products, etc., which is attractive to some high-net-worth crypto investors. Since Bitcoin is a POW mining mechanism, there is no stable POS asset pledge income. Considering that the average deposit and withdrawal costs of cryptocurrencies and fiat currencies are 0.2%, the difference in income between holding Bitcoin ETFs and holding coins directly is not large.
However, for Ethereum spot ETFs, since regulation does not allow ETFs to obtain staking income, for crypto investors, holding ETFs will result in 3%-5% less risk-free annualized returns than directly holding Ethereum spot. Ethereum adopts the PoS (Proof of Stake) mechanism, which verifies transactions and maintains the network by staking Ethereum assets through validator nodes, and obtains block rewards, which is the so-called POS mining mechanism. Since this income comes from the network protocol and the system's built-in reward mechanism, it is regarded as the Ethereum ecosystem's on-chain risk-free basic yield. Recently, the Ethereum staking yield has stabilized at more than 3%. Therefore, if the Ethereum position configuration is realized through ETFs, the annualized yield will be at least 3% less than directly holding Ethereum spot. Therefore, the buying of Ethereum spot ETFs by high-net-worth people in the crypto circle can be ignored.
Figure 7: Staking yield since Ethereum switched to POS mechanism
2. In the long run: Ethereum ETF paves the way for other crypto assets to integrate into the mainstream world
As the largest public chain at present, the approval of Ethereum's spot ETF is an important step for the public chain to integrate into the mainstream financial world. After reviewing the standards for SEC's approval of cryptocurrency ETFs, Ethereum meets SEC requirements in terms of anti-manipulation, liquidity, and pricing transparency. In the future, we can expect more crypto assets that meet the requirements to enter the public investor's field of vision through spot ETFs.
Anti-manipulation: On the one hand, the nodes on the chain are sufficiently decentralized, and the ETF assets are not pledged. The number of Ethereum nodes exceeds 4,000, which prevents a single node from controlling the entire network; in addition, Ethereum spot ETFs do not allow pledges, which prevents a small number of entities from excessively controlling the network due to the pledge mechanism. On the other hand, in the financial market, Ethereum's basic trading facilities are relatively mature, especially its rich futures products on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), which provides investors with more hedging options and price predictability, reducing the risk of market manipulation.
Liquidity & pricing transparency: Ethereum has a market value of approximately $420 billion. Looking at the market value alone, it can be ranked in the top 20 of the US stock market capitalization ranking. Ethereum's 24-hour trading volume is $18 billion, and it is listed on nearly 200 exchanges, ensuring sufficient liquidity and fair and transparent pricing.
In comparison, Solana in the public chain also meets the above indicators to a certain extent (see Figure 8 for details). Vaneck and 21Shares have successively submitted applications for Solana spot ETFs. With the continuous enrichment of traditional financial market tools such as cryptocurrency futures, we can expect more crypto asset ETFs to be approved in the future, thereby further occupying the minds of traditional investors, gaining entry, and accelerating development.
Figure 8: Comparison of core data of representative Layer 1 public chains
In summary, since the buying and selling power of Ethereum spot ETF is weaker than that of Bitcoin ETF, and the market has experienced the mistaken killing of Bitcoin caused by the outflow of Grayscale GBTC, it is also prepared for the outflow of Grayscale ETHE. In addition, it has been 6 months since the listing of Bitcoin spot ETF. The positive news of the approval of Ethereum spot ETF has been reflected in the current Ethereum price to a large extent after repeated market transactions. It is expected that the short-term impact on the price of Ethereum will be smaller than the impact of the previous listing of Bitcoin spot ETF on Bitcoin, and the volatility of Ethereum may also be smaller. If there is another mistaken killing due to Grayscale outflow in the early stage of listing, it will be a good layout opportunity. Investors can pay attention to it through the US Ethereum spot ETF dashboard specially launched by SoSoValue ( https://sosovalue.com/assets/etf/us-eth-spot ).
In the long run, the crypto ecosystem and the mainstream world are moving from their past separate development to integration, and there will be a long period of cognitive adjustment in the middle. The difference in cognition between new and old participants in the crypto ecosystem may be the core factor affecting the price fluctuations of cryptocurrencies and creating investment opportunities in the next 1-2 years. In history, the process of emerging assets integrating into the mainstream world has always seen divergences and transactions, and large fluctuations have continuously brought investment opportunities, which is worth looking forward to.
The approval of Ethereum ETF further opens the way for crypto-ecological applications to enter mainstream asset allocation. It can be foreseen that other infrastructures such as Solana, which have a large number of users and ecosystems, will gradually integrate into the mainstream world. While the crypto world is entering the mainstream world, the other side of the times, that is, the process of the mainstream world entering the crypto world, is also quietly developing. Mainstream financial assets, mainly U.S. Treasury bonds, are also on the chain in the form of RWA (Real World Assets) tokens, gradually entering the crypto world, realizing the efficient circulation of global financial assets.
If the approval of the Bitcoin ETF opens the door to a new world of integration between encryption and tradition, then the approval of the Ethereum ETF is the first step into the door.
