Pavel Durov speaks for the first time after being released: explains the reason for his arrest and will leave the market that violates Telegram’s principles

avatar
MarsBit
09-06
This article is machine translated
Show original

Thank you for your support and love!

I was questioned by police for four days after arriving in Paris last month. They told me that I could be held personally liable for the illegal use of Telegram by others because the French authorities had not received a response from Telegram.

This is surprising for several reasons:

1. Telegram has an official representative in the EU who is responsible for accepting and responding to EU requests. Anyone in the EU can find its email address by searching "Telegram EU law enforcement address" on Google.

2. There are multiple ways for the French authorities to contact me for help. As a French citizen, I frequently visit the French Consulate in Dubai. Some time ago, when asked, I personally helped them set up a hotline with Telegram to deal with terrorist threats in France.

3. If a country is unhappy with an internet service, the norm is to bring legal action against the service itself. Using pre-smartphone laws to charge a CEO with third-party crimes on the platform he manages is a misguided approach . Technology development is hard enough. Innovators would not develop new tools if they knew they could be held personally liable for potential misuse of those tools.

Striking the right balance between privacy and security is not easy. You have to reconcile privacy laws with law enforcement requirements, local laws with EU laws. You have to take into account technical limitations. As a platform, you want your processes to be consistent globally, while also ensuring they cannot be abused in countries with weak rule of law. We are always committed to working with regulators to find the right balance. Yes, we stand by our principles: our experience is shaped by our mission to protect users in authoritarian regimes . But we are always open to dialogue.

Sometimes we cannot agree with a country’s regulators on the right balance between privacy and security. In such cases, we are ready to leave that country. We have done this many times. When Russia asked us to hand over “encryption keys” for surveillance purposes, we refused – Telegram is banned in Russia. When Iran asked us to block channels of peaceful protesters, we refused – Telegram is banned in Iran. We are ready to leave markets that are incompatible with our principles because we are not in it for the money. We are in it to bring good and defend people’s fundamental rights, especially where these rights are violated.

All of this doesn’t mean that Telegram is perfect. Even the fact that authorities might be confused about where to send requests is something we should improve. But the claims by some media that Telegram is some kind of anarchist paradise are absolutely untrue. We delete millions of harmful posts and channels every day . We publish daily transparency reports (such as this one (http://t.me/stopCA) or this one (https://t.me/isiswatch)). We have direct hotlines with NGOs to process urgent moderation requests faster.

Yet, we hear from some that this isn’t enough. The sudden increase in Telegram users to 950 million comes with growing pains and makes it easier for criminals to abuse our platform. That’s why I’ve made it a personal goal to ensure we make significant progress in this area. We’ve already started this process internally, and I’ll be sharing more details on our progress with you soon.

I hope that the events of August will make Telegram, and the entire social networking industry, safer and stronger. Thanks again for the love and memes

Source
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
6
Add to Favorites
3
Comments
1