Author: Bingwa

Perhaps the distance between us and evil is only a "Binance Selection". This time, the uproar and curses from the Redstone project community have given all the answers.

If the project party only needs to pay enough listing fees, can they purchase the legal right to plunder from Binance, and instantly deprive the community of countless efforts?

Last night, Redstone opened the airdrop claim, but in less than ten minutes, the community exploded, with waves of condemnation, from the Chinese community to the English community.

Counting it down, the most common keyword in the community is "fraud", and the most common demand is that "CZ and Binance should immediately delist this fraudulent project".

What did Redstone do to provoke such intense reactions from the community? It can be summarized in the following three points:

1. Fraud in the rules. During the years-long project development process, many users completed over hundreds of tasks, including various special tasks on holidays, and were constantly hinted that by completing tasks and earning points, they would receive future airdrops. But in the end, the airdrop rules suddenly introduced a so-called "special role" that was required to be eligible, which had never been mentioned before.

2. Excessive old-user pool. According to community feedback, it is roughly estimated that over 98% of participants are not eligible for the airdrop, and these loyal community participants have mostly participated in every task and activity.

3. Significant reduction in promised rewards. The project party previously claimed that 10% would be given to the community, but the current estimate is less than 2%. According to incomplete statistics, only 4,000 addresses received the airdrop.

Since the project party has already planned to stand against the community and kneel to capital, the community's curses cannot wake up a project party without bottom lines and integrity.

The question we need to ask is, why did all this happen after Redstone was listed on Binance? Is Binance Selection a "strict consideration of reputation, value and traffic good projects" sieve, or a "as long as the protection fee is paid, the funnel that can realize the exemption of fraudulent projects"?

If every minute that the retail investors stayed up late to complete tasks becomes a stepping stone for the project party when they ring the bell on Binance, and the community members harvested by Redstone are just traffic data and fee fuel in Binance's eyes???

If the so-called "Binance Selection" has become the last haven for malicious project parties, then isn't the listing standard behind it actually a profit-sharing standard???

When the project party is blatant, and Binance remains inactive, we do not hesitate to question everything from the most malicious angle. This is a desperate cry, and also a call for hope in Binance.

Every intense condemnation from the community is backed by countless blood and tears. The money is gone and can be earned again, and we can accept being reversed under the same rules, but we absolutely cannot tolerate fraud!!!

I sincerely hope that when we examine the development of the industry, we will be horrified to find that all the harvesting scythes are stamped with Binance's steel, and I hope even more that not all the tombstones of the cannon fodder are engraved with "Binance Selection".

As an industry leader with the ability to change all this, Binance should not remain inactive, indifferent, or even be an accomplice!

I believe Binance is not a dragon, Binance is still that young dragon slayer!