This is the correct Groq question:
What’s better for a society: a 400% rise in Bitcoin or a 400% increase in money supply?
To evaluate which scenario is more beneficial to a society—everyone holding 100% of their savings in Bitcoin with a 400% price increase, versus everyone https://twitter.com/grok/status/1923830625540374670

Twitter

Source: Galaxy Research
Translation: Jinse Finance
Bitcoin's closing price in 2025 is expected to be roughly the same as the level at the beginning of the year.
The cryptocurrency market experienced a genuine bullish wave in the first ten months of this year. Regulatory reforms continued to advance, ETFs continued to attract funds, and on-chain activity became increasingly active. Bitcoin hit an all-time high of $126,080 on October 6th.
However, the market failed to deliver the expected breakout after the initial frenzy; instead, it experienced rotation, repricing, and rebalancing. This was driven by factors such as unmet macroeconomic expectations, a shift in investment narratives, leveraged liquidations, and the actions of whale...

Galaxy: 26 Predictions for the Crypto Market in 2026

Following the controversy surrounding Fundstrat's Bitcoin views, co-founder Tom Lee responded, stating that the "contradictory predictions" seen by outsiders were actually research conclusions from different positions and timelines, not internal disagreements. Previously, Sean Farrell, head of digital asset strategy at Fundstrat, suggested that Bitcoin might retrace to the $60,000-$65,000 range in the first half of 2026; while Tom Lee believed Bitcoin could reach new highs, even surging to $200,000 as early as the beginning of 2026. A Fundstrat...

Tom Lee responds to Fundstrat's "contradictory" views on Bitcoin: Different positions, different timelines, not internal disagreements.

While fixed-rate returns are higher, liquidity is a price crypto users are unwilling to pay.

Why do DeFi users reject fixed interest rates?

- **Economic effects**:
- **Pros**: Increased money supply could stimulate spending or investment initially, especially if injected via government spending or loans. Debtors (including governments) benefit from reduced real debt burdens.
- **Cons**: Hyperinflation risk. A

Conversely, a 400% fiat money supply increase erodes purchasing power through inflation, punishes savers, benefits debtors, and risks economic collapse. The Bitcoin scenario fosters confidence and wealth preservation, while the fiat scenario undermines both, making the former