Haha, @cz_binance really put in the effort for this debate... If someone presents you with a piece of gold that comes with a certificate and asks you if it's real or fake, what would you do? Then, as a gold enthusiast, @PeterSchiff knows that one cannot judge gold by sight or touch alone—this is something anyone who understands gold knows; density must be measured with instruments. Therefore, he could only say, "I don't know..." Then CZ can establish a very good argument: "Gold is far less verifiable than BTC, and it can be faked!" This tactic involves setting the theme at the start of the debate, shifting the focus from values ​​to applications, effectively turning the debate into their own domain... If I were Peter, I would answer, "That's a question for you. When did you buy this gold? How much did you pay for it?" If CZ says this is fake gold bought for the purpose of a debate, it would seem too deliberate. If it is real gold that he brought back a long time ago, then its value has already doubled. In other words, the discussion can be shifted from the authenticity and verifiability of gold to the value of gold itself. Unfortunately, Peter immediately fell into CZ's trap, actually comparing it to the gold bracelet, which meant he had already lost this round... People in the crypto are so cunning, hahaha!