WTF levels of scientific ignorance.
Obviously, the carbon in wood came from the air to begin with. That's why it's called the carbon cycle.
If @washingtonpost has any competency, every journalist and editor responsible for this nonsense would be immediately fired.

Many fireplace lovers assume burning wood for warmth is climate-friendly.
But wood emits 2.5 times as much CO₂ than natural gas and 30 percent more than coal when burned for heat, according to some scientists. https://wapo.st/3YJjlt0

The Washington Post

Twitter

Two months after Trump’s tariff headline detonated a historic liquidation cascade, Bitcoin is still stuck in a different kind of market, one with less leverage, thinner liquidity, and a weaker bid fro...

Crypto traders say “something broke” after in October, the data says the market really did change

This year has rewritten the map for crypto journalism across Asia. Far from converging around a single, continent-wide authority, the region’s readership and influence have hardened into local pockets...

Local Voices and KOLs Now Steer Asia’s Crypto Narrative, Not Global Mastheads

After a flood of documents and photographs from the Jeffrey Epstein files dropped this month, even more material from the sprawling archive is expected to roll out under a U.S. Department of Justice r...