More to the point, the Immigration & Nationality Act requires the hearings. It is codified in statute along with avenues for relief, so what Miller advocates is a rejection of the rule of law. When they strand H-1B workers abroad under the guise of social media vetting, it is a rejection of the rule of law.
Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)
@adamscochran
12-26
Believe it or not @StephenM the constitution does not contain the text:
“Only if it’s convenient to do so”
It does not give a fuck about how long it takes.
It says it clearly and unwaveringly that:
“No *PERSON* shall ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due x.com/thomassowell/s…
From Twitter
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments
Share
