[English Twitter threads] Which projects outperformed after the 2025 TGE?

This article is machine translated
Show original

Chainfeeds Summary:

The market no longer pays for "potential," but instead begins to reward the "structure" itself: reasonable circulating supply, fair allocation mechanism, credible and real use, and controllable and predictable unlocking pace.

Article source:

https://x.com/stacy_muur/status/2005860641517756605

Article Author:

Stacy Muur


Opinion:

Stacy Muur: Aster is almost the cleanest example of everything a project can get on TGE day: broad exchange coverage, ample liquidity, and a "DeFi perpetual contract" narrative that traders can truly understand. The prevailing narrative throughout the year can be summarized in one sentence: "Binance-backed perpetual contract + privacy features." The price movement itself is quite controversial (you could call it a ZK concept premium, a shadow game with CZ, or simply "better execution"). But regardless, it remains one of the few projects not suitable for immediate selling after TGE. Folks Finance is completely different. It's a lending protocol token, yet in a year where "boredom is alpha," its success seems sufficiently boring. The formula is simple: Binance + Kraken support on launch day, continuous growth in cross-chain liquidity pools, and no obvious cliff-like unlocking. And the importance of this last point is far greater than most are willing to admit. The good story continues until December 15th—the moment the unlocking begins. Avici is the outlier that proves the rules exist. Its victory wasn't due to the most complex technology, but rather its clearest and cleanest narrative on CT: "Fair issuance + truly usable product." The market repeatedly emphasized not the token economic model, but the use cases: a working new bank app, Visa cards, and real-world spending scenarios. In a market flooded with numerous intrinsic "utilities," AVICI's selling points stood out remarkably as clean, authentic, and perceptible off-chain. And it proved to be one of the best TGEs this year. When a token "rises for a reason," it often "holds its ground for that reason." In the reflexivity-driven late-cycle, one of the strongest performers was Sentism.ai. Its structure was very straightforward: AI Agents narrative + continuous incentive distribution + broad exchange coverage. On CT, the mainstream narrative remained consistent: "AI Agents are the next-generation DeFi automation layer." This provided traders with a simple and stable psychological anchor. From a mechanistic perspective, the key to $SENTIS was that it didn't rely on a one-off launch pump. Continuous token distribution (tasks, backdrops, participation rewards) keeps users engaged long-term, often translating into sustained spot demand—as participants position themselves for future distributions and ecosystem milestones. This structure supports price even before on-chain usage fully takes off. OVERTAKE follows a similar path, but with a game + marketplace platform shell. Its core narrative is: "Web2 distribution capabilities + Web3 settlement track." Its advantage lies in its readability: players trade assets, $TAKE is the toll token; staking and revenue sharing provide an incentive to hold. When people talk about "real yield," they often just package emissions as APY. The narrative here is closer to: "Fee → Buyback → Stakers." Even with a discount, the market still accepts this direction. Then there's Rain. It's more of an event-driven repricing than a "fundamental victory." The main catalyst for the price action came from an extremely clear news story: reports surfaced that a Nasdaq-listed company planned a nine-figure allocation linked to a vault strategy for $RAIN. Headlines of this caliber quickly alter market behavior: market makers widened spreads, momentum funds poured in, and off-exchange funds flowed back in, because the story can be told in a single sentence. This doesn't automatically validate $RAIN's long-term PMF, nor does it eliminate execution risk. But it explains why $RAIN didn't trade like a typical small-cap TGE: the buying wasn't just retail reflexivity, but a narrative strong enough to support longer-term attention and larger positions.

Content source

https://chainfeeds.substack.com

Source
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments