이지랩스(구 바이낸스랩스)가 성명서를 발표하고 “BNB에 집중 투자하고 있는 나스닥 상장사 CEA 인더스트리(CEA Industries) 이사회가 주주들의 목소리를 무시하고 자신들의 권한을 과도하게 확대하고 있다”고 비판했다. 그러면서 “이사회는 현재 포이즌 필(경영권 침해 시도 시 기존 주주가 시가보다 싼 가격에 지분을 매입해 대응하는 권리)을 도입하려 하고 있으며 이는 주주 친화적이지 못한 행위다. 또 주주 대부분은 CEA 인더스트리 BNB 집중 전략을 보고 투자했는데, 이사회가 이 전략을 바꾸려고 시도하고 있다. 이사회는 회사의 이익이 아니라 사익을 더 우선하고 있다”고 강조했다.

이지랩스 “BNB 매집 ‘CEA 인더스트리’ 이사회 독선적 운영”

EasyLabs (formerly Binance Labs) released a statement criticizing CEA Industries, a NASDAQ-listed company heavily invested in BNB, for &quot;ignoring the voices of shareholders and excessively expanding their authority.&quot; They emphasized, &quot;The board is currently attempting to introduce a poison pill (the right for existing shareholders to purchase shares at a price below the market price in the event of an attempted takeover of management rights), which is unfriendly to shareholders. Furthermore, most shareholders invested in CEA Industries based on its BNB-focused strategy, but the board is attempting to change this strategy. The board is prioritizing self-interest over the interests of the company.&quot;

EasyLabs: "CEA Industries' BNB Purchase Board Operates Autocratically"

Author: Dfarm

When talking about Polymarket, many people know that its core is: YES + NO = 1. But do you really understand this simple formula? Today, I'll explain Polymarket's shared order book in detail!

If you check Polymarket's official documentation, you'll find that the price calculation is explained as follows:

You might not fully understand it after reading this, but that's okay. Let me give you an example.

A torn dollar bill

Some people think YES 0.7 + NO 0.6...

A comprehensive explanation of Polymarket: Why must YES + NO equal 1?

Users of digital assets are increasingly concerned about filing crypto tax returns as on-chain volume continue to rise.
These issues are occurring against the backdrop of many countries adopting reporting frameworks...

Hidden costs of crypto profits: Why small investors struggle with tax filing.

Written by: Maitong MSX Researcher The past cannot be changed, but the future can still be shaped.

2025 has passed in the blink of an eye. This year, the global financial market underwent round after round of extreme stress tests: geopolitical fluctuations, volatile macroeconomic expectations, fading narratives, and liquidity divergence occurred intermittently. Meanwhile, tokenization quietly accelerated, driven by compliance and infrastructure development.

It can be said that from TradFi to Web3, two previously parallel forces are converging at an unprecedented speed, aiming at the on-chain and programmable nature of various financial assets.

To restore the market's "sentiment"...