$WINNING 0x5c4207f5dcd7454d4464b4742c4c3ca4208f4444 Have you noticed the shift in the pace of BSC lately? Before, it was all just random stuff; now they're talking about operational mechanisms. CZ's statement that winning is the best response to FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt) isn't essentially about morality, but about a systemic survival strategy. The underlying logic is actually quite brutal. In this circle, people don't really care about the truth. The cost of spreading the truth is too high, while emotional feedback is extremely fast. When a system is attacked by online trolls and besieged by public opinion, defense is useless. Because defense means you've entered the opponent's game rhythm, and you're consuming your existing resources to explain things that are fundamentally inexplicable. The best feedback mechanism is iteration. Why did this Ticker work? Because it symbolized this game. The so-called WINNING is actually using incremental changes to cover up the noise. As long as the system is running and the data is still being processed, all doubts will become a form of reverse fuel. It's like playing a game: the more monsters you encounter, the more experience points you gain upon completion. This is a kind of cognitive advantage. Players today are smarter; they no longer simply look at the superficial aspects, but rather the upper limit of the narrative. If a project can be aligned with the survival will of industry giants, its consensus-building cost is extremely low. Essentially, it's a game of probability; everyone is betting on whether this positive narrative can trigger a larger-scale consensus response. The logic isn't complex; whether you can see through it depends on your own perspective. Risk Warning: The above are personal opinions only and do not constitute investment advice.