I was thinking about Magma Finance while having a meal. With the DeFi momentum and the Sui ecosystem trend, the question naturally follows: "So, what makes Magma different?" So, I thought about it in connection with the 2026+ roadmap. In conclusion, isn't Magma a project that aims to integrate the entire profit-generating process into one? To generate profits in DeFi today, users must personally decide, transfer, and manage LP, lending, and Liquid Staking separately. Even if you put it in a vault, it's not like, "We'll take care of the rest," but more like, "You check to see if it's running smoothly." Magma's roadmap seems to be aiming to change this structure itself. Bundle various on-chain revenue sources, such as ALMM LP, DEX, Lending, and Liquid Staking, into a single strategy. Integrating and eliminating users from having to directly judge - where to invest - when to change - and what the current performance is - they intend to hand over that judgment to the AI Strategy Engine. What's particularly impressive is not the AI being "showy" but rather the fact that the entire process of strategy design, evaluation, recommendation, and performance analysis is being automatized. When assets are placed in a vault, it automatically manages them. The system rebalances, and AI then recommends strategies tailored to user preferences and risk, and compares performance. This isn't simply convenient DeFi; it seems like an attempt to move DeFi from the realm of "management" to the realm of "product." Ultimately, the future Magma envisions isn't a "market where only those who know how to make money survive." ➡️ DeFi where profit strategies are packaged, curated, and automated. From this perspective, Magma is a DEX, but it also feels more like a SUI-based profit strategy layer. That's why Magma Finance is attracting attention these days: TVL or It's not just about APR. How far can DeFi go to provide solutions? >> Wouldn't this question offer a pretty far-reaching answer?