I never expected there would be such bored people on GitHub, nitpicking over the wording and insisting that what I'm doing can't be called a native desktop GUI.

Below are a bunch of similar cases. I clearly explained all the implementation methods and architectural details, yet people accuse me of lying just because of a few words in the Readme, saying it's not a native application—isn't that offensive? Besides, this is an open-source product, and the requirements are quite high. I hope these same high standards can be applied to large companies that, like me, are browser wrappers.

And when submitting issues to open-source projects, at least show some courtesy. Provide some background information, describe the specific problem, and explain how you intend to address it. What does it mean to come up with sarcastic remarks like "we shouldn't have used the word 'native'"?

Some people nitpick over the tone of my replies, completely ignoring the fact that these two people are raising such nitpicking issues in Issues, and their sarcastic complaints about the software being bloated and unreliable—isn't that polite enough?

Many people are still debating the word "native." I've never felt that using "native" is inherently right, but I don't think it's a big deal either. 1. If you raise an issue politely and offer suggestions, I'll correct it immediately. 2. However, if you're just complaining, saying it's not "native," or even adding something like "this thing is too bloated," implying it's full of unnecessary code, then I don't think I need to respond politely.

Later, some people even went to GitHub to hurl insults, which was quite interesting.