The research metric used in this article is: Trading Volume/Assets (Core Asset POR). The logic is straightforward: In the same field/sector, with similar trading targets and audiences, the efficiency of capital utilization should theoretically be similar (unless there are special events, long-tail assets, incentives, etc.). As for the benchmark, I specifically chose a non-CEX benchmark – Hyperliquid. However, this algorithm has a problem: it seems to be at a disadvantage for companies with a large number of "long-tail assets," such as @MEXC_Official and @htx (even though both have a large number of core assets). I'm specifically mentioning this to show that different metrics (angles) will lead to different conclusions when looking at the same issue. This article only offers a glimpse from one perspective. When you feel disappointed with industry data, try this: http:/youcanshortit.com If you're not optimistic, you can short sell.
This article is machine translated
Show original
Sector:
From Twitter
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments
Share
Relevant content




