Blur did not halve its earnings as expected, and it was delayed by 1 month. The comments are full of scolding, fuck blur has become politically correct in the NFT field, here are some of my thoughts.
miner:
Understand why the big miners (AirDrop) represented by @machibigbrother are dissatisfied. The advantages of the previous AirDrop have been diluted by the double rewards extended for one month, and the interests have been damaged. This is like the project party being a gaming miner.
NFT players:
The complaints and abuse in the comments generally said that blur "ruined the NFT market", and specifically accused blur of introducing the following problems:
1) Let playing NFT change from a collection to a game of trading and swiping AirDrop, which is not as pure as it used to be;
2) Giant whales control the NFT market price;
3) floor price falls (fluctuates violently);
I have some thoughts and doubts about the above questions
1) If you are a collector, it seems that you don’t need to pay attention to short-term price fluctuations and the thoughts of other people in the community, just collect with people with the same values;
2) The fact that the giant whale controls the market price is actually the same everywhere, and the currency price of cex is also the same, but it is not as clear as it is on the chain;
3) The decline in floor price is nothing more than the poor Liquidity of the previous NFT giant whales, which made it inconvenient to ship, and the decline was slower. Bad projects will return to zero sooner or later; really good projects are not afraid of short-term failure.
The change brought about by blur is to introduce Liquidity for NFT, making it easier for large investors to participate. In the short term, the disadvantage is that the giant whale manipulates the price/floor to fluctuate violently.
If this model holds true, in my opinion, the long-term benefits outweigh the disadvantages for the NFT market:
For some NFTs, artistic attributes are the main ones; for a large part of NFTs, financial and transactional attributes are the main ones.
For the latter, the improvement of Liquidity can bring more fresh Liquidity to the market by allowing anyone (especially big investors/whales) to enter and exit conveniently.
In the os mode, the big bulls dare not enter, lack of Liquidity, unable to enter and exit with large funds, who dares to trade. Even in the 21-year NFT bull market, if you dare to invest in NFT with a little bit more money, you will be exit liquidity, and only small funds will have profit opportunities.
Blur should not be just blamed, but a little more tolerance and further observation should be made. Only good Liquidity can bring about the real long-term prosperity of NFT.
After observing the statement, Blur's tvl did not drop significantly. It seems that although most miners were dissatisfied, they still accepted it; and the real demand maker did not leave.
