avatar
丰密KuiGas🔆
96,109 Twitter followers
Follow
专注值得交互的协议,匠心铸就人类高质量 TX ⛽️ 嗡藏巴啦扎唸达哑梭哈🙏 一站式链上链下交易 #okx:https://t.co/ndLjOShioB 使用 #Binance 交易:https://t.co/dxoLXgumeM @33daoweb3 @kuiclub
Posts
avatar
丰密KuiGas🔆
03-31
Leveraging Momentum: Finding People, Funding, and Growth Many project management and operations teams are actually too far removed from the market. They only focus on their own small territory, and when the market turns bad, they start acting erratically. It's not that there aren't opportunities, but rather that many ecosystems and projects don't know how to leverage momentum. I suggest that ecosystems and projects that haven't yet partnered with WLFI (@worldlibertyfi) on USD1 should talk to WLFI. The core idea is to use the current momentum of WLFI promoting USD1 to simultaneously boost their own business data. User transaction volume, TVL, and activity can all be increased simultaneously. USD1 is already quite large: I looked at DefiLlama, and among stablecoins with a TVL exceeding $4 billion, only USDT, USDC, USDS, USDe, DAI, and USD1 are mentioned. USD1 ranks 6th with a market capitalization of $4.4 billion and has already been deployed on 10 chains. More importantly, it's still growing. For example, two months ago, the USD1 supply on the Solana chain was only $160 million, but now it has reached $855 million. Lending protocols within the ecosystem, such as Kamino, Bonk, and Ray, have provided support from the outset, and all data points show significant growth. This demonstrates that WLFI is not just a name; it is genuinely pushing resources, liquidity, and subsidies. Following the collaboration between Aster Chain and WLFI in the first two weeks, 16 spot and perpetual trading pairs were launched immediately upon release. Trading with USD1 has significantly lower fees than USDT; the order book fee for USD1 is only 0.5 bps, while USDT is 4 bps. The user experience is very direct, resulting in a trading volume of $2.7 billion in the first week. Furthermore, WLFI provides substantial incentives: USD1 perpetual trading earns WLFI based on trading volume, with a maximum of 2.5 million WLFI distributed weekly per month; even holding USD1 on Aster without trading also earns proportional rewards. For active users like myself, I'm willing to go wherever there are rewards, profit potential, and safety. The most interesting and direct aspect of this type of collaboration is its win-win nature. On the surface, it's helping WLFI promote USD1, but in reality, the project teams are using WLFI's subsidies to drive their own growth. Simply put, they're using other people's money to attract their own users, build their own data, and promote their own business. My advice is straightforward: ecosystems/project teams that haven't yet partnered with WLFI's USD1 should approach them more often. This isn't just about acquiring a stablecoin; it's about acquiring a ready-made growth tool. Project teams should really be thinking about how to find people, funding, and growth, and how to create a wealth effect. Instead, when the market is bad, they should only think about how to sell tokens, how to profit, and how to shift the pressure onto users.
USD1
0%
avatar
丰密KuiGas🔆
03-26
One-sided trading activity, without any buy orders to maintain it. This is a common risk signal directly pointed out in Binance's latest "Market Maker Risk Warning". I found this quite insightful. Over the past year, most Altcoin have been steadily declining in value. Many projects claim to have found market makers, but in reality, they may have found "high-end coin-selling institutions." In a normal market-making process, there should be both buy and sell orders, providing liquidity, narrowing price spreads, and stabilizing the market. However, some so-called market makers only sell and don't buy. Last year, I discussed this with many friends, and the conclusion was that market makers' logic is simple: since the price is likely to fall anyway, they sell first and then buy back at a lower price later. Cryptocurrency prices generally peak upon listing and then steadily decline, ultimately becoming a game of who can exit first. What's most frustrating is that some projects clearly announce the release of tokens, and the airdropped amount is small. The trading volume appears high, but the price keeps plummeting like it's on Viagra. You can't understand where the tokens are coming from or how they can keep selling. Undoubtedly, this isn't normal market making; it's highly likely a guise for continuous unloading of shares. If this continues, the country will cease to exist, and everything will fall into chaos. Binance has brought this issue to the forefront this time. I think the whole article was written relatively restrainedly, without naming names, but the meaning is very clear. This is not only a risk warning, but also a public rebuke to a group of market makers and project teams, and even has the flavor of an industry declaration. Especially in the current market conditions, this is also a warning to all project owners: who did the project owner hire as a market maker, how were the tokens distributed, and how did the other party sell them? They can't just deny knowing and deny it. They shouldn't pretend not to know anymore. Project owners have a responsibility to conduct due diligence and to continuously monitor the situation. It was also explicitly stated that chambers of commerce that violate regulations by engaging in market making will be blacklisted, and reporting of violations will also be allowed. This is tantamount to a message to market makers and project teams: stop packaging this fake market making and real distribution as normal market behavior. Binance is taking the initiative to assume industry responsibility and is preparing to redefine the rules for this industry. Market Maker Risk Warning | _2024111120230_ |
loading indicator
Loading..