avatar
Bill The Investor
96,306 Twitter followers
Follow
Co-founder of DeCentralized VC @MCNVentures; No paid promotion; 刻剑派、躺平派及吃瓜派三派掌门; 不接受任何付费广告;没有任何付费群; #bitcoin 🇺🇦
Posts
avatar
Bill The Investor
Recently, Bitcoin and gold have diverged dramatically: gold has surged, repeatedly hitting new highs (reaching as high as $5,600/ounce, now hovering between $4,900 and $5,000, with a projected increase of over 60-70% by 2025-26), while Bitcoin has fallen from its 2025 high (approximately $120,000-$126,000) and is currently fluctuating between $70,000 and $89,000, even showing a slight decline or remaining flat this year, down more than 30-40% from its peak. The BTC/Gold ratio has fallen to a historic low (approximately 13-18 ounces of Bitcoin can be exchanged for 1 ounce of gold), and gold's market capitalization far surpasses Bitcoin's (35 trillion+ vs. BTC 1.4-1.7 trillion). This divergence between "real gold reaping the benefits while digital gold suffers the blows" has led many in the crypto to exclaim that the narrative has "collapsed." However, the logic is actually quite clear: the macro environment is characterized by risk-off and a surge in uncertainty (geopolitical friction, hawkish expectations from the Federal Reserve, the shadow of Trump's tariffs, sticky inflation, and central banks' massive gold purchases). Gold has perfectly benefited from the safe-haven advantage; Bitcoin, on the other hand, has exposed its "high-beta risk asset" attributes, acting like a larger version of Nasdaq, and was first hit by leveraged liquidations and a market crash. Short-term core drivers comparison: • Gold: Central banks are increasing their holdings (over 1,000 tons globally per year, with China/BRICS leading the way), making it a top choice for safe-haven assets and inflation hedges, and its volatility once surpassed that of Bitcoin (reaching a new high since 2008), thus becoming a new "high-beta speculative asset". • Bitcoin: It falls first when ETFs experience outflows and risk appetite declines, without any independent catalysts; its correlation turns negative (BTC/Gold is around -0.2), and it is often used as a source of cash to reduce holdings when gold leads the market. Each has its own advantages: • Gold (the veteran defender): Millennial consensus + physically non-confiscable, preferred central bank reserve, low volatility (15% annualized return vs. BTC 70%), the ultimate shield against geopolitical/sovereign risks. Currently, it's the clear winner. • Bitcoin (Rising Star): Absolutely scarce (21 million hard cap + halving supply <1%), 24/7 global instant transfer, borderless, programmable (DeFi/Layer2), dominated by younger generations and tech enthusiasts. High long-term returns (213x over the past 12 years vs. several times that of gold), but short-term volatility correlates with risky assets. • Complementary, not substitutive: Reports from Fidelity and JPM indicate a long-term, mild positive correlation (or even a period of negative correlation with cyclical shifts), with gold often leading and then BTC following suit. History repeats itself (in 2020, gold hit a new high first, followed by a surge in BTC). BTC's market capitalization is only 4-5% of gold's, meaning even small adjustments by institutions can have significant upside potential. What's your opinion? Should you continue to go all in on gold and wait for its "final dip," or should you accumulate BTC at lower prices and bet on a catch-up rally?
BTC
2.49%
avatar
Bill The Investor
What is the truth behind Epstein's case? Let's examine Patrick Boyle's conspiracy theory: This isn't a simple 'sex scandal,' but a textbook example of the failure of elite power, money, and the system. 1. Epstein, a college dropout with no formal financial background, amassed hundreds of millions of dollars? The source was almost entirely through Les Wexner (owner of Victoria's Secret) entrusting him with real estate, airplanes, and a private island—this isn't financial advisory; it's clearly a shadow banking/money laundering channel. 2. After the DOJ released 3 million pages of documents (plus photos/videos) in 2026, the official narrative collapsed—no complete client list, no clear blackmail video, no hard intelligence evidence, yet the layers of red-acted descriptions and 'co-conspirators' were not investigated. 3. Ghislaine Maxwell's 2003 birthday book (238 pages, leather-bound) is even darker: handwritten letters from political and business figures/grotesque children's themes/sexual innuendo, far exceeding 'embarrassment,' resembling a pledge of loyalty or a blood oath. 4. The 2008 Acosta sweet deal ('He's intelligence, don't touch him') + Maxwell's father Mossad's background led Boyle to imply that Epstein was at least an intelligence broker/asset. 5. Documents expose a two-tiered justice system: ordinary people were convicted long ago, while elites only had their 'connections' exposed (Clinton's 26 flights, Gates' multiple meetings, old photos of Trump). Even more ironically, Boyle's analysis video was demonetized by YouTube (yellow label/soft censorship), proving that touching the truth is punished by the algorithm. Conclusion? The Epstein case is a product of the system: a network of mutual guarantees among the powerful + regulatory capture + institutional failure. Unclear source of funds + layers of cover-up + intensified censorship = a perfect closed loop. This is not a conspiracy theory, but financial reality.
loading indicator
Loading..