Even if we were to deny Marx's historical materialism and consider the notion that productive forces necessarily determine relations of production to be nonsense, we should not forget, in the discussion of the relationship between AI and Crypto, the anti-Marxist master Karl Popper's observation:
"Historical determinists have recently pointed out that such influences may be related to the social sciences, potentially increasing the difficulty of making accurate predictions and thus compromising their objectivity. They say that if the social sciences were so developed that they could make accurate scientific predictions of any social fact and event; however, such an assumption would lead to absurd conclusions, and therefore such an assumption could be refuted by pure logical reasoning. Because, if such a newly formulated..." A scientific social calendar, and one that is known to all (since it can be rediscovered by anyone in principle, it cannot remain secret for long), will inevitably induce actions that disrupt predictions. For example, suppose people predict that the stock market will rise for three days and then fall. Obviously, everyone connected to the market will sell stocks on the third day, causing the stock market to fall that day, thus disproving the prediction. In short, the idea of a precise and detailed social event calendar is self-contradictory: therefore, precise and detailed scientific social prediction is impossible. Isn't Crypto the field that best embodies the 'Oedipus effect' proposed by Popper himself, where AI and humans coexist? Naturally, in such a society, the consensus on Bitcoin versus gold is self-evident.
