avatar
Kaff 📊
15,777 Twitter followers
Follow
Daily Ape #2017 Ambassador: @Kollab3dotcom, @LightLinkChain,@BsquaredNetwork My only TG: http://t.me/kafka0202 DailyAPE: http://t.me/KaffDailyApe
Posts
avatar
Kaff 📊
Thread
► Why EIP-8141 Is The Top Choice For Ethereum Quantum Resistance! Google dropped a paper saying quantum computers need 20x fewer qubits to crack ethereum wallets than we thought. The goalposts on crypto security just moved. An attacker with a fast enough quantum computer could execute an "on-spend attack" and ~6.9M BTC already has exposed public keys. #Ethereum is actually in a worse spot structurally. Every EOA that has ever sent a tx has already exposed its public key. – ~65%+ of ETH sits in exposed addresses – ~20.5M ETH just in the top 1k wallets – millions more in staking, L2 bridges, admin keys Ethereum foundation already has an answer. EIP-8141, proposed by Vitalik + the same people who built ERC-4337, and claimed to ship within a year. The core idea is to stop tying every ethereum account to a single ECDSA signature path forever. It introduces a new transaction type (0x06) called a frame transaction. Instead of one call, a transaction becomes a sequence of "frames" that separate the three things that were always bundled together: VERIFY → run your custom validation logic → calls new APPROVE opcode (0xaa) if legit SENDER → execute the action DEFAULT → system-level flows like paymasters EIP-8141 removes the ERC-4337 bundler layer entirely and makes native AA available to every account at the protocol level with faster confirmations, lower fees, same censorship resistance as a regular ETH transfer. The quantum-resistance angle is that when ECDSA breaks, you just rotate to a hash-based or lattice-based scheme through a VERIFY frame. Your existing 0x address doesn't change. it's a protocol-level exit from a single point of failure that every ethereum account currently has. Naturally you'd expect this to be urgent, right? Yet EIP-8141 isn't even a headliner for the next Hegotá fork. It's stuck at CFI. The all core devs process is consensus-based and the proposal is still too heavy. – touches too many layers at once (tx format, mempool, execution) – VERIFY frames require node-level simulation → potential DoS surface – mempool rules still not fully specified (same problem as 4337's opcode sandbox) – adds implementation risk across every EL client simultaneously This is too big to risk the fork timeline. But CFI isn't rejection. The authors are actively working on the DoS protection spec. Next ACD call is the real decision point. Even if EIP-8141 misses #Hegotá and gets pushed to the next upgrade, everything's still fine. Quantum timeline is still 10–15 years out, the solution already exists, and ethereum isn't standing still. The architecture is built, just waiting to be activated.
ETH
2.95%
loading indicator
Loading..