avatar
인생코인
Follow
Posts
avatar
인생코인
$BASED Summary of Official Position on the Tokenomics Controversy (Korean) 1. General Position • There has been considerable criticism and concern regarding $BASED tokenomics over the past day. The team is aware of issues such as poor communication, Ethena distribution, the existence of Season 3, and Sybil issues. • Token launch is not simply about distribution; it's about aligning early contributor rewards with long-term ecosystem growth. • BASED's long-term goal is to become a mainstream fintech-level crypto platform like Robinhood. ⸻ 2. Token Supply & Launch Philosophy • If the initial circulation is too small, community formation will fail, and if it's too large, there's a risk of price collapse due to lack of liquidity. • The launch will not be delayed due to market conditions (e.g., BTC below 70k). → Based on product completeness, community, and ecosystem readiness. ⸻ 3. Seasonal Community Rewards • Season 1 (approximately 3 months): $7.63M in fees • Season 2 (approximately 3 months): $5.34M in fees • 60-70% of profits are redistributed to users (affiliate/referral rewards) • S1 = 8%, S2 = 8% token allocation • Due to the short season, a simple comparison with "10% for other projects" is inappropriate ⸻ 4. Q&A Key Summary Q1. Why are tokens given to exchanges (Launch Partners)? • Refers to exchanges and distribution partners, not influencers • To ensure liquidity, accessibility, and price stability • Includes vesting conditions ⸻ Q2. Why is Ethena included in the Genesis distribution? • Ethena is not simply an external entity, but a community with substantial contributions. • HyENA joint project → Core engine of growth. • Ethena Community: 7.5% of total supply. • 20% unlocked for 3 months after TGE. • The remainder vests after 1 year. • BASED community receives tokens immediately, before Ethena. ⸻ Q3. Why is there investor allocation? • Capital that enabled early survival. • 1-year lockup + 24-month linear vesting. ⸻ Q4. Why is 20% of the team allocation? • Long-term builder incentives & core personnel retention. • Cannot be sold before the community. • Fully vested. ⸻ Q5. Why is Season 3 included in the Genesis Distribution? • Genesis is based on the "economic vesting point," not the actual payment point. • Season 3 runs from January to May → included in the Genesis distribution. ⸻ Q6. Why are $PUP holders eligible for Genesis distribution? • Signaling remaining loyalty even in a bear market, not for short-term farming. • To strengthen community stability and long-term holder base. • Token conversion, not airdrop. • No snapshots. ⸻ Q7. How do you handle Sybil? • Analyze millions of on-chain and off-chain data. • Use Based Alignment Score. • Criteria: • Ongoing use. • Excluding single-event activities. • Actual trading risk. • Partial deductions for trading primarily in stablecoin pairs. • Removed tokens will be redistributed to the actual community. ⸻ Q8. Why only 8% per season? • The season is very short, at 3 months. • Based on the entire points period (June-December 2025, 6 months), → A total of 28.5% is distributed to the community, including S3. • To prevent short-term over-distribution. ⸻ Q9. What are the Based Card Points? • Detailed information will be provided upon the release of the airdrop checker (before TGE, mid-March) ⸻ Q10. What about buybacks/fee sharing? • Only confirmed details will be announced. • Announcement will be made after regulatory and implementation issues are resolved. • No empty promises. ⸻ Q11. How much was removed from Sybil? • Redistributed to normal community users. ⸻ Q12. What is the TGE schedule? • Target: March • Additional exchange launches are being prepared. • Any changes will be immediately announced with the reason.
BASED
0%
avatar
인생코인
Why Prediction Markets Will Go Permissionless My Opinion The melee team published an article arguing that the gated system should be replaced with a permissionless system in prediction markets. They cited the example of pump.fun, but I believe that permissionless systems cannot completely replace gated systems. This is because prediction markets and tokens are structurally different. Tokens can exist if they can be issued, but in prediction markets, if there are ambiguous questions, disputes over data sources, or unclear settlement criteria, disputes arise and trust is lost. The reasons why Polymarket and Kalshi stick with the gated system are clear. Oracles (the issue of settlement trust), liquidity (the minimum requirement for market formation), etc. These conditions are inherent problems inherent in the prediction market structure, and regulatory risks are also difficult to avoid. Of course, permissionless systems may increase the number of markets and create a wider variety of markets, but at the same time, There's a high possibility that useless markets like pump.fun will proliferate. Increasing supply and market functioning are two different things. Prediction markets are structured so that liquidity cannot be dispersed. Collective intelligence is data, and transactions themselves become prices. Without transactions, the market itself cannot exist. A market without trust cannot generate price signals, and without price signals, prediction markets have no meaning. Who would bet on an uncertain market? This isn't to say permissionless prediction markets are impossible. It's difficult to agree with the claim that they will replace gatekeeper systems at the same pace as token markets. Permissionless prediction markets are ultimately abstract. Of course, when permissionless prediction markets become established, prediction markets will accelerate. x.com/meleemarkets/status/2020...
PUMP
6.71%
loading indicator
Loading..