Lighter airdrop analysis: The next Hyperliquid or an overvaluation trap?
TL;DR
Lighter has confirmed the transfer of 250M LIT tokens (25% of the total supply) to the distribution wallet, with TGE expected to be completed by December 31, 2025 (86% probability on Polymarket). While 24-hour trading volume ($3.1-4.5B) is approaching Hyperliquid's level, key metrics show significant differences: OI is only 1/5 of Hyperliquid's ($1.58B vs $7.5B), TVL is 1/3 ($1.37B vs $4.14B), and the zero-fee model limits revenue growth. The OTC presale price of $3-5 implies an FDV of $3-5B , a 2-3 times increase compared to the $1.5B funding valuation, raising the risk of airdropped farmers exiting the program.
Airdrop Core Details
Token Distribution and Timeline
The transfer of 250M LIT tokens has been confirmed as complete .
- Transfer time : 03:00 UTC on December 20, 2025
- Source address : 0x077842a5670cb4c83dca62bda4c36592a5b31891 (Team multi-signature wallet, holding 60% of the total supply)
- Target address : 0x98e7769167194a8cf272b649319676be84052b5f (allocated wallet, currently holding ~77.5M LIT)
- Percentage of total supply: 250M / 1B = 25%
Airdrop schedule :
- The deadline for submitting the allocation form is 14:00 UTC on December 26, 2025 (now closed).
- Season 2 Points Farming : Last batch distributed by December 26-27, 2025
- TGE Probability : Polymarket predicts an 86-93% probability of a trade before December 31st, with a trading volume of $9.5-11.7M.
Points system :
- Total points distributed: 9-12M points
- Market expected exchange rate: 20-28 LIT/point
- OTC points trading price: $600/point (implying LIT price $21.4-30)
- Witch/Volume Boosting Points have been reduced and redistributed.
A comprehensive comparison with Hyperliquid
Trading volume and liquidity metrics
| index | Lighter | Hyperliquid | Difference multiple |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24-hour trading volume | $3.13-4.53B | $5.02B | 0.6-0.9x |
| 30-day trading volume | $218-248B | $167B | 1.3-1.5x |
| TVL | $1.37B | $4.14B | 0.33x |
| Open Interest (OI) | $1.58B | $7.53B | 0.21x |
| Daily active user address | 437 (128k per month) | 37,653 (257k per month) | 0.01x |
Key findings :
- Lighter briefly surpassed Hyperliquid's daily trading volume during the Christmas holiday period (December 24-25) ($5-6B vs $3.5-5.6B), but the difference in OI and TVL was significant .
- Lighter leads in 30-day cumulative trading volume , but Hyperliquid's OI is 4.8 times higher , indicating that Hyperliquid has stronger position depth and capital retention capabilities.
- Lighter's daily active users were only 437 addresses (December 27th), a sharp drop of 85% compared to 2,976 addresses on December 22nd, indicating a decline in the activity of airdrop farmers.
Business Model and Revenue
| Dimension | Lighter | Hyperliquid |
|---|---|---|
| Fee model | Zero transaction fees (retail users) | Market makers: 0.02%, Buyers: 0.035% |
| 24-hour revenue | $0 | $1.7M (annualized $742M) |
| Cumulative income | $0 | $847M (since startup) |
| Income distribution | not disclosed | 99% buyback of HYPE + dividends to holders |
The double-edged sword of Lighter's zero-fee strategy :
- Advantages : Attracts high-frequency traders and rapidly accumulates trading volume.
- Disadvantages : No protocol revenue , making it difficult to support token value capture and long-term operating costs.
- In contrast , Hyperliquid absorbs approximately 13% of the circulating supply annually through a fee-based buyback mechanism, thus creating a closed-loop value system.
Comparison of Token Economics
Lighter (LIT) :
- Total supply : 1B LIT
- Distribution supply : 0 (before TGE)
- FDV estimate : $3-5B (based on OTC price of $3-5)
- Valuation at the time of funding : $1.5B (November 2025, $68M funding)
- Token holding concentration : The top three addresses hold 82.75% (60% for the team, 7.75% for the allocated wallets, and 15% for others).
Hyperliquid (HYPE) :
- Total supply : 1B HYPE (maximum supply)
- Distribution supply : 238M HYPE ( 23.8% )
- Market capitalization : $6.18 billion
- FDV : $24.92B
- Price : $25.91 (ATH $59.30, -56%)
- Distribution structure : Genesis 51%, Core Contributors 39% (currently unlocking linearly over 24 months), Foundation 10%.
Valuation Analysis :
- Lighter FDV/Funding Valuation Multiple : 2-3.3x ($3-5B / $1.5B)
- Hyperliquid's market capitalization to FDV ratio : 0.248 (float market capitalization 23.8%)
- If the initial circulation of Lighter is similar (25% airdrop + some team release), a reasonable FDV target is $2-3 billion , corresponding to a LIT price of $2-3.
On-Chain Data In-Depth Analysis
LIT Token Holding Structure
Extreme centralization characteristics (before TGE):
| Ranking | address | Holding | percentage | type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 0x0778...1891 | 600M LIT | 60.00% | Team Multisign Wallet |
| #2 | 0xb305...4ee4 | 150M LIT | 15.00% | Unmarked (suspected team/investor) |
| #3 | 0x98e7...2b5f | 77.5M LIT | 7.75% | Airdrop Distribution Wallet |
| Top 10 | - | 935.4M LIT | 93.54% | - |
Risk signals :
- The top investor holds 60% of the shares , indicating extremely high risk due to concentrated holdings in a single sector.
- The absence of exchange-linked wallets among previous holders suggests a potential large release of tokens after the CEX listing.
- The distribution wallet has allocated ~20M LIT to 20 addresses, with 230M LIT remaining to be released.
Trading activity and liquidity
Lighter Protocol Metrics (December 27, 2025):
- 24-hour trading volume : $3.13B (BTC/USDC $1.64B dominated)
- Open interest : $1.58B (BTC/ETH dominant)
- TVL : $1.37B (USDC deposit, Ethereum + Arbitrum dual-chain)
- Daily active addresses : 437 ( an 85% decrease compared to 2,976 addresses on December 22)
LIT futures market (pre-market trading):
- Total OI : $59.9M (+10.7% 24h)
- Hyperliquid DEX: $33.4M (Largest Market)
- Binance: $22.4M
- 24-hour liquidation : $46.4k (Shorts $27.4k > Longs $19.0k)
- Funding rate : +0.001-0.005% (long positions pay short positions, slight bearish signal)
Community sentiment and market narrative
KOL and analyst opinions
Bullish camp (based on technical analysis and background) :
- VC backing advantage : $68 million in investment from a16z, Lightspeed, Founders Fund, and Ribbit Capital endorses the project.
- ZK technology is superior : it uses custom ZK circuits to achieve verifiable matching and clearing, a technology that outperforms traditional CEX architectures.
- Tier-1 Potential : If it can capture a user base similar to Hyperliquid, trading volume could reach $10-20 billion per day.
Bearish camp (voting concerns about valuation and sustainability) :
- Overvalued : The valuation jumped from $1.5B in funding to $3.3-5B FDV (+120-233%), primarily driven by airdropped farmers rather than genuine demand.
- Revenue quality issues : Claiming 90% of trading volume comes from airdropped farmers , large-scale withdrawals are possible after TGE.
- The points-based OTC trading mechanism is a VC exit strategy : the $600/point trading system has been criticized as a tool for institutions to cash out early.
Neutral faction (wait-and-see attitude) :
- The community is calling for an AMA to clarify key issues such as the token release schedule, listing plans, and fee structure adjustments.
- Polymarket's forecast highly reflects market expectations (86%), but the probability drops to 70% after December 29th , suggesting a risk of delay.
Mainstream Narrative Analysis
| Narrative | Core Argument | risk assessment |
|---|---|---|
| "The next Hyperliquid" | Similar technical architecture, comparable transaction volume, and strong VC backing. | High risk : OI/TVL gap is 5 times, zero-revenue model is unsustainable. |
| "Airdrop Feast" | 25% token airdrop + high OTC price of points | Medium risk : Farmers face pressure to exit the market, leading to a sharp increase in circulation rates. |
| "Valuation bubble" | FDV's valuation has doubled compared to its financing valuation, but it lacks revenue support. | Confirmed : $3-5B FDV has no fundamental support. |
Technical Analysis: LIT Price Trend
Price and Volatility (Binance Futures LIT/USDT)
Current price : $3.337 (as of December 27)
- 24-hour change : -4.1% (down from the high of $3.56)
- Key support : Lower Bollinger Band at $3.229 (1-hour chart)
- Key resistance : Bollinger Band upper rail at $3.543 (4-hour chart)
Multi-timeframe technical indicators
| Timeframe | RSI | MACD signal | Trend judgment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 hour | 49.9 (Neutral) | Price close to EMA12/26 | Consolidation |
| 4 hours | 71.8 (Overbought) | Histogram -0.128 (bearish divergence) | pullback risk |
| 1st | 82.0 (Extremely overbought) | Histogram +0.317 (Bullish) | Parabolic upward trend, be wary of pullback. |
Risk signals :
- The daily RSI is at 82 , indicating an extremely overbought zone. Historically, this level has typically been followed by a 20-30% pullback.
- The 4-hour MACD shows a bearish divergence, suggesting a high probability of a short-term pullback to the $3.0-$3.2 support level.
Risk Factor Assessment
High-risk factors (🔴)
Overvalued :
- An OTC price of $3-5 implies an FDV of $3-5 billion, representing a premium of 100-233% compared to a financing valuation of $1.5 billion.
- Under the no-revenue model, the FDV/TVL ratio is 2.2-3.7 (Hyperliquid is 6.0, but it is supported by revenue).
Token concentration :
- The top three addresses control 82.75% of the supply, posing a significant risk of selling pressure.
- The airdrop allocation wallet holds 77.5M LIT (~$260M), and its daily release could impact the market.
Airdropped farmers exit :
- Daily active addresses plummeted from 2,976 to 437 ( -85% ), and this may worsen after TGE.
- Most OTC traders using points are short-term arbitrageurs, not long-term holders.
Medium-risk factors (🟡)
Zero-income model :
- The lack of transaction fees results in a lack of cash flow for the protocol , making it difficult to sustain operations and token buybacks in the long term.
- If transaction fees are introduced in the future, users may be lost to zero-fee competitors.
Market competition :
- Hyperliquid has captured 56-73% of the perp DEX market share , demonstrating a significant first-mover advantage.
- Mature projects such as dYdX, GMX, and Synthetix have formed a multi-polar landscape.
Low-risk factors (🟢)
Technology and Compliance :
- The ZK circuit code has been open-sourced and passed audit (December 26).
- Ethereum L2 deployments are composable and can be integrated into the DeFi ecosystem.
Institutional endorsement :
- Top VCs such as a16z, Lightspeed, and Founders Fund provide liquidity guarantees.
Conclusion: A rational view of the "airdrop feast"
Core judgment
Lighter is unlikely to become "the next Hyperliquid" for the following reasons:
- Fundamental differences : OI is only 1/5 of Hyperliquid's, TVL is 1/3 , and the zero-revenue model cannot support long-term token value.
- Valuation bubble : OTC prices imply FDV of $3-5 billion, representing a 100-233% premium over a $1.5 billion financing valuation, lacking fundamental support.
- Liquidity risk : The top three addresses hold 82.75% of the supply. An airdrop of 25% will cause the circulating supply to surge to ~30-35% , resulting in significant selling pressure.
- User retention concerns : Daily active addresses have plummeted by 85% from their peak; the withdrawal of farmers after the TGE airdrop may cause a collapse in transaction volume.
Airdrop Participation Strategy
Conservative strategy (recommendation):
- Wait 1-2 weeks for TGE prices to stabilize , then observe actual trading volume and user retention.
- Pay attention to the liquidity depth after listing on a CEX to avoid rushing in during periods of low liquidity.
- Target entry price: $1.5-2.5 (Reasonable FDV $1.5-2.5B, P/S multiple reference dYdX/GMX)
Aggressive strategy (high risk):
- Participating in the airdrop allocation, TGE quickly took profit on the first day (target $3-5).
- Strictly set stop-loss orders (-20%) to prevent a sell-off and subsequent stampede.
- Long-term holding is not recommended until a revenue model is introduced in the agreement.
The essential difference between it and Hyperliquid
| Dimension | Lighter | Hyperliquid | Reasons for the gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Value capture | None (zero fee) | Strong (annualized $742M revenue repurchase) | Business model defects |
| Network effects | Weak (437 daily active users) | Strong (37k daily active users, 257k monthly active users) | Low user retention rate |
| Liquidity depth | OI $1.58B | OI $7.53B | Insufficient capital accumulation |
| Token distribution | Concentrated (Top 3 holdings: 82.75%) | Dispersed (circulation 23.8%) | High risk of selling pressure |
Final recommendation : Lighter's 25% airdrop is a short-term speculative opportunity, not a long-term investment . Investors should be wary of the risks of high valuations, a zero-revenue model, and concentrated selling pressure, and participate rationally rather than blindly chasing the trend.