# SIREN has rebounded more than 110% after its price was halved, becoming a cash cow for speculators.
12 KOL Opinions
loading indicator
Loading..
Deep Dives
69
19
Comments
Deep Dives
Powered by Asksurf.ai

SIREN Price Analysis: After a 50% drop, it rebounded by over 110%, manipulated by large investors like an "ATM".

Key Insight : SIREN (BSC chain contract 0x997A58129890bBdA032231A52eD1ddC845fc18e1 , Meme/AI Agent project) has indeed rebounded by over 110% from its March 25th low of $0.797 to its current price of $1.81 (a 24-hour increase of 103%). However, this is not a healthy rebound, but rather a continuation of the manipulation of the Binance contract index by large investors using an extremely high control ratio of 88.5% on Gate/Kucoin with shallow liquidity. The total liquidation amount exceeds $23 million (with $910,000 recently primarily short positions), similar to cases like RIVER/BEAT, where retail investors repeatedly "contribute" to become the large investors' ATM. Data as of 09:22 UTC on March 28, 2026, is relatively recent, but the precise distribution of on-chain holders relies on indirect verification by Arkham. CoinGecko

Why is this important? Under this manipulation model, rebounds can easily turn into new harvests: the big players hoard spot goods + push up prices with long positions → induce short selling with negative fees → dump the shares and liquidate positions → buy back at low prices. The current market capitalization is $1.324 billion (total supply of 1 billion tokens), with active trading at $159 million, but 88.5% of the tokens are concentrated, amplifying the manipulation risk. Retail investors who chase the high prices are likely to become victims.

Price movement: After being halved, it rebounded sharply with extremely high volatility.

SIREN started at $0.35 at the end of February, surging to a peak of $3.605 in mid-March (its market capitalization once reached $3.675 billion, placing it in the top 30), before halving to a low of $0.797 on March 25 (a drop of over 78% from its peak). It then rebounded from March 26-28 to $2.077, then $1.692, and finally to $1.81, a cumulative increase of over 110%. On March 28, it rebounded 128% from its closing price of $0.795, but historical patterns suggest that such fluctuations are often manipulated by large investors. (CoinGecko )

Key period OHLC data (March 23 to March 28, 2026, daily UTC) CoinGecko

date opening Highest lowest Closing Daily increase Remark
2026-03-23 0.9421 3.6051 0.9265 2.2879 +144.3% Peak surge, suspected to be a trap for bulls
2026-03-24 2.3294 3.0496 2.1447 2.3591 +3.2% High-level fluctuations
2026-03-25 2.3634 2.5615 0.7972 1.0209 -56.7% Halved Low Point
2026-03-26 1.0206 2.7457 1.0206 2.0778 +103.5% Rebound started
2026-03-27 2.0472 2.3492 1.4942 1.6917 -18.6% pullback digestion
2026-03-28 1.6683 1.7349 0.7255 0.7949 -53.0% The price rebounded to 1.81 (+128%) during the day.

Analysis : The rebound after the price halved stemmed from large investors buying on dips after a sell-off (short sellers liquidated 800,000 USD), but open interest surged to $58.83 million on February 8th, indicating earlier signs of trouble. The current price is $1.8113, with a market capitalization of $1.324 billion and 24-hour trading volume of $159 million (12% of market capitalization). While liquidity appears ample, it is actually shallow and easily manipulated. (CoinGecko)

Liquidation and leverage data: Short sellers were the main victims of margin calls, while market manipulators "raked in" over $23 million.

The total liquidation volume across the network was once second only to BTC/ETH/XAU, ranking fourth ($23.25 million). Recently, it aggregated $910,000 in the past hour, with only $103,000 from long positions and $807,000 from short positions, confirming the logic of a short-selling trap: market makers hold long positions to collect "free funds" at negative fees, then dump short positions to liquidate short positions. (Coinglass)

Liquidation type Amount (USD) percentage period
General liquidation 910,216 100% Recent 1-hour aggregation
Multiple liquidations 103,032 11.3% -
Short selling 807,184 88.7% The main force of the market maker is to induce short selling.
All-network historical peak 23,250,000 - March 23-24 high period Odaily

Why ATM ? Gate's spot supply is only 64,000 tokens (Arkham data, 3/22). A $100,000 trade can trigger a 40% price fluctuation, causing liquidations in the Binance futures index (Gate accounts for 25%). Even after adjustments, the futures index remains shallow, allowing large players to manipulate the market and profit from small-scale spot price drops.

Evidence of market manipulation: 88.5% control of the market, with minimal liquidity used for "cross-exchange profiteering".

Multiple sources confirm that a major player (suspected to be DWF Labs, denied by Zac) controls 88.5% of the supply (644 million on-chain coins, 52 wallets + CEX portion). EmberCN aggregates Arkham tokens 048c9efe-27e9-4581-b433-066c807af2f9 ). Arkham saw intensive aggregation of 66.5% on March 22-23, pushing up the price → negative fees inducing short selling (starting March 14) → 78% volatility in the first 10 minutes of trading on the Gate on March 23 (450,000 tokens traded) → a large bearish candlestick pattern, similar to River/Power/Beat. (Odaily )

Technique breakdown :

  1. Accumulating spot holdings and opening long positions : 88.5% of the holdings, pushing the price up to $5.
  2. Short selling in a trap : negative rates give away money to short sellers.
  3. Market crash and liquidation : Gate/Kucoin shallow pool (64,000 coins) is easy to control, liquidation of 23 million coins.
  4. Buying back at low levels : A rebound marks the beginning of a new cycle.

On-chain interactions are sparse (DeBank received only 18 transactions in 30 days, with no large transfers), allowing for minimal manipulation by major players. Dune lacks a SIREN holder chart, but news reports are consistent across different platforms.

Social and News Sentiment: Promotion and Criticism Coexist, KOL Early Warning and Control

Most of the 951 tweets were promotions for Diadem_ETH ("no SIREN no LAMBO"), but KOLs directly accused the market manipulators: EmberCN commented "88.5% one-man show," xiaoheshang said "the market manipulators draw lines arbitrarily," and laofeiyyds said "it has a TRB feel to it." Odaily/Techflow and others provided detailed analyses of leveraged scams, noting that the stock price fell 59% to $1.01 on March 24th before rebounding. X Odaily

Sentiment is neutral to slightly negative: retail investors are experiencing FOMO (Fear of Missing Out), and professionals should be wary of "harvesting schemes".

Risk Assessment: High risk of manipulation; retail investor ATM confirmed.

Risk factors Severity Details and impact
Chip concentration high 88.5% controlled by major shareholders, ready to dump shares at any time. [Arkham/Odaily]
shallow liquidity high Gate: 64,000 tokens traded, with 100,000 tokens driving a 40% increase, easily triggering cross-exchange liquidation.
Liquidation Cycle high Short sellers dominated, repeatedly profiting from negative rates that "push prices up for free".
Contract Exception middle Open interest of 58.83 million, a signal from two months ago, suggests the Binance index is easily controllable.
Project essence middle Meme/AI Agent: No fundamental analysis, pure speculation.

Mitigating factors : The trading volume of 159 million provides apparent liquidity, but does not change the underlying control mechanism. Data limitations: Dune lacks a precise shareholder chart and relies on indirect information from Arkham News.

Conclusions and Outlook

SIREN's 110% rebound after a 50% drop is true, but the root cause is a cyclical manipulation by large investors with 88.5% control and shallow pooling: retail investors contributed over 23 million in leveraged funds, allowing large investors to buy low and sell high with no risk. The current price of $1.81 seems like an opportunity, but it's actually a trap—similar cases often end with a large bearish candle. Recommendation : Avoid chasing the price up, monitor Gate.cn/EmberCN updates; short-term traders should wait for confirmation of stabilization below $1.20, while long-term traders should avoid this. In a sluggish market, such "broccoli florets" (a type of short-term trading strategy) are frequent; be wary of leveraged FOMO (Fear of Missing Out). (Odaily)

Ask Surf More