Magic Newton today left a tweet saying 'last'. In the previous @MagicNewton related post, he consistently said [transaction is ultimately important]. Because Yuhu, Kaito, and even Newton showed focus on AI agent activity. 📍Current active wallets are only 19,000. Total transaction volume is $7.33 million In other words, average transaction volume is $36 per wallet 📍Daily active wallets are 17,000, average below $10 Each wallet is creating 3.7 transactions per day. (Referring to @InvestingDams' post.) Contrary to expectations, very few wallets are 'just trying' and 'creating many proper transactions'. Active wallets are increasing, but average transaction volume per wallet is decreasing -> Situation where only 'just trying' has increased I looked at this data and set up 5 agents buying $5 per hour for a week. Anyway, it's not consumption but 'DCA', and I was going to buy Ethereum anyway, so I'll proceed through Newton. Since Newton account said it's the last, I want to burn the last flame. Personally, it was based on the observation of valuing agent activity, just inferring and proceeding, but transaction increase ≠ reward increase. This is a brain-based, not official statement. Hope gNEWT has good results

If you haven't done it yet, I recommend that you try it out thinking of buying Bitcoin for just 7 days. Instructions are attached.

+ There is another reason why I value projects. Let's say we take a snapshot for user compensation. What is the standard? Agents are free to set the amount, period, and number. After setting up an agent, you can freely cancel it. There may be an effect, but it is difficult to identify actual users with the amount, period, and number. (Someone may pay $10 per hour for 3 days with 2 agents, and someone may pay $100 per week for 30 days with 5 agents... If we do it with the amount, period, and number, someone will be dissatisfied, right?) Therefore, the most certain indicator for selecting actual users is the "number of projects" or "fee." In fact, since they paid the fee through the project, it can be seen that they contributed to the project. Doing it once a day with 5 agents Doing it once an hour with 1 agent In these cases, I think the latter is probably more advantageous... You can also consider the number of active agents, so I think it would be good to mix them appropriately. Anyway, I think the most important thing is the number of transactions. A genius in case of rebuttal

@MirraTerminal

@MirraTerminal