Analyzing RWA token securitization and comparing the current global regulatory situation

This article is machine translated
Show original
The Hong Kong stablecoin draft, the US GENIUS, the European MiCA, and the passage of Southeast Asian legislation are undoubtedly a significant advancement in the application layer of RWA.

Authors: Li Zhongzhen, Song Zeting

What is RWA?

RWA (Real World Assets) refers to converting physical assets from the real world (such as real estate, gold, artwork, etc.) or property rights (such as debt rights, revenue rights, fund shares, etc.) into digital tokens that can circulate on the blockchain. It is an innovative model that achieves asset fragmentation, open ledgers, free circulation, and automated management. Its technical foundation relies on the blockchain's immutability and smart contracts' automatic execution capabilities, and requires legal confirmation to ensure the consistency of on-chain rights and underlying asset ownership. In simple terms, RWA is very similar to asset securitization in traditional finance, but more innovative and flexible.

[The rest of the translation follows the same professional and accurate approach, maintaining the technical terminology and context of the original text.]

Since most RWA tokens may be considered securities tokens, they must be securitized, which means these RWA tokens must comply with the securities regulatory policies of their circulation area. Otherwise, if deemed non-compliant, they may face massive fines or even criminal risks. Global Regulatory Landscape for RWA Tokens Currently, there are no specific regulatory policies for RWA tokens. As RWA tokens are essentially crypto assets, their regulation still applies to the crypto asset policies and regulations of various regions. (I) Hong Kong Hong Kong's regulatory draft for RWA stablecoins was officially passed on May 21, 2025, discussing the compliance framework and regulatory possibilities through 8 key points: 1. Licensing system and entry thresholds 2. Reserve asset requirements 3. Transparency and information disclosure 4. Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing 5. Legal enforcement rights of regulatory authorities 6. Cross-border coordination and enforcement 7. Investor protection mechanisms 8. Technological advancement and sustainable regulation [The rest of the translation follows the same professional and accurate approach, maintaining the original meaning while translating into clear English.]

(III) Singapore

On January 14, 2019, Singapore passed the Payment Services Act (PSA) and continuously revised it as a "forward-looking and flexible framework for regulating payment systems and service providers". This act replaced the previous Payment Systems Supervision Act and Currency Exchange and Remittance Businesses Act. Additionally, The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) issued Notification PSN01 under the PSA (Prevention of Money Launand Terrorism and terrorism Financing - Designated Payment Services), introducing Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) requirements for regulated payment service providers. This means payment service providers must implement the measures to achieve achieve regulatory compliance:

  • Risk assessment and mitigation>

  • Customer due due didiligence

  • Reliance on third parties

  • Agent accounts and wire transfers

  • Record keeping

  • Suspicious transaction reporting

  • Internal policies, compliance, audit and training

On March 27, 2025, the Monetary Authority of Singapore issued the "Paper on the Prudential Treatment of Cryptoasset Exposures and Requirements for Additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 Capital Instruments for Banks", aiming to implement the updated prudential treatment and disclosure standards for cryptoasset risks by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). It mentioned that cryptoassets passing all classification conditions are categorized as Group 1a cryptoassets (tokenized versions of traditional assets) or Group 1b cryptoassets (cryptoassets designed to exchange pegged value, with a predpredefined reference asset or asset value and an effective stabilization mechanism).

For cryptoassets classified as Group 1b, BCBS prescribed a redemption risk test for cryptoasset, at assets are sufficient to redeem the pegged value at any time. To pass the redemption risk test, banks must ensure the reserve assets of cryptoassets meet conditions related to the value, composition, and management of reserve assets.

(IV) European Union

In June 2023, the European Union officially released the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (Mii), two categories of regulatory targets:

1) The first cryptoasset isis, including stcoinissuanders other cryptoassetissuers.

MiCA has the following main requirements forStablecoin issuers:

  • Obtain authorization before issuance

  • Fulfill disclosure obligations

  • Hold a certain scale of own funds and reserve assets

MiCA has relatively relaxed requirements for other cryptoasset issuers:

  • Issuers must establish a legal entity within the EU

  • Publish a whitepaper

2) The second category of regulatory targets is cryptoasset service providers. MiCA's requirements for cryptoasset service providers mainly include four aspects:

  • Obtain authorization

  • Improve governance structure

  • Minimum capital requirements

  • Consumer protection and transparency requirements

[The rest of the translation follows the same professional and accurate approach, maintaining the technical terminology and context.]

Sector:
Source
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments