US Secretary of State Marco Rubio's Comments on the Risk of Closing the Hormuz Strait and Military Response
On Sunday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned that Iran might dig its own grave by threatening to block the Hormuz Strait, cautioning about the potential US military response if this occurs.
His statements were made during a Fox News interview, following a large-scale US military airstrike that decimated three of Iran's nuclear facilities.
US Hard-Line Policy towards Iran and Military Intervention
Marco emphasized that Iran has been playing a "cat and mouse" game with nuclear negotiations for 40 years. He affirmed that the US has few options other than military campaigns to address Tehran's procrastination. The airstrikes targeting Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, conducted by over 125 aircraft, more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles, and numerous bunker-buster bombs, reflect the US's uncompromising determination.
This was partly a result of the US administration viewing Iran as a decisive challenge in foreign policy. Marco affirmed that the airstrike was to clearly demonstrate that Washington is ready to use tough measures to force Tehran back to face-to-face negotiations without intermediaries.
Iranians Will Pay a Heavy Price if Blocking the Hormuz Strait
Marco warned that if Iran decides to close the Hormuz Strait, the consequences would be far more negative than beneficial. Approximately 20% of global oil passes through this strait, severely impacting the world's largest economies.
The Iranian government recently decided to agree to a plan to close the strait following US airstrikes. The Iranian military has spoken about its defensive capabilities and forewarned of a strong retaliatory action.
Anti-Submarine Strategy and Global Response
According to experts, the US airstrike used a "diversion tactic" to avoid detection. US fighter jets flew westward towards the Pacific as a decoy, while the main combat teams moved eastward for 18 hours to attack the targets.
In this context, European countries continue to apply pressure, encouraging Tehran to return to negotiations. The US remains resolute about not wanting intermediaries, clearly showing a desire for direct talks to resolve tensions.
The Role of Cryptocurrencies in New International Conflict Contexts
In the context of political tension and war, the cryptocurrency ecosystem is increasingly playing a crucial role in resilience and asset preservation. Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ripple, and Ethereum have become means of avoiding sanctions and state controls.
Cryptocurrencies can help businesses and individuals maintain value during periods of strong volatility, especially when economies are heavily impacted by war and embargo policies. Using cryptocurrencies as an exchange medium and value storage has become an irreversible trend in the global financial world.
Perspectives on Energy Security and the Role of Cryptocurrencies
In escalating tensions, economies dependent on oil and gas energy are considering enhancing financial diversification options, with cryptocurrencies being a strategic choice. Some analysts believe that blockchain and decentralization technologies could promote sustainable energy supply management, reducing dependence on strategic transportation routes like the Hormuz Strait.
In the long term, cryptocurrencies could become a global financial method, limiting the impact of energy wars, contributing to building a decentralized DeFi ecosystem, enhancing countries' resilience during global crises.
