Is Bitcoin under attack... from within? Knots vs. Core is more than dev drama—it's a fight over Bitcoin’s soul: 🟧censorship vs. freedom 🟧ideology vs. incentives 🟧control vs. decentralization We lay it all out Bitcoin Is At War ⚔️ Why Ordinals Are NAT In Danger! youtu.be/esoUDV6xZvA A growing rift is emerging in the Bitcoin community around the Bitcoin Knots vs. Bitcoin Core debate, which ultimately comes down to philosophy and approach. Bitcoin Core, the reference implementation, is known for its conservative, consensus-driven ethos that prioritizes stability and security over rapid change. Bitcoin Knots, maintained by @LukeDashjr, is a derivative of Core that introduces stricter policy rules, additional features, and patches not included in the main client. Advocates see Knots as offering stronger protections against spam and a more principled framework for how Bitcoin should operate, while critics argue it adds unnecessary complexity, concentrates influence in the hands of a single maintainer, and deviates from Core’s neutral baseline. We examine perspectives from key developers and influencers on both sides, outlining the core points of contention. Ultimately, we argue this debate is unlikely to result in major shifts, as economic incentives push miners to prioritize network usage and innovation. This dynamic ensures continued subsidy value for miners, even as the percentage of node operators running Knots slowly increases. ✍️Sign up to receive our newsletter for weekly updates! theblockrunner.com Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed by The Block Runner are for informational purposes only and do not constitute financial, investment, or other advice.