Correct take, finally. Privacy coins failed because they conflated two unrelated value props: 1.) Store of value / speculation vehicle. 2.) Transaction privacy. Monero maxis spent a years arguing "digital cash" while 99% of holders just wanted number go up. Result: • Delisted from exchanges, • Used by approximately nobody for actual commerce. Privacy protocols > privacy coins because: 1.) Privacy as a feature layer (@aztecnetwork, @RAILGUN_Project) works with existing assets. Don't need to convince people to hold a new token just to transact privately. 2.) Privacy features are harder to ban than privacy-native chains. Can't delisting a smart contract. 3.) Opt-in privacy when needed vs. forced privacy always. Most people don't need privacy for buying coffee. They need it for salary payments or sensitive transactions. 4.) Using Tornado (RIP) didn't require pumping TORN. The utility existed independent of token price.
From Twitter
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments
Share
Relevant content




