Paid CodeHawks contests since May 2025: 0 I have a lot of respect for CodeHawks. They made a very principled stand that they would never run conditional pot contests. I think that decision was a major contributor to their lack of contests. x.com/CodeHawks/status/1976669...… Sherlock is a very principled org as well and we almost went down the same path. Water wants to flow downhill, and you can't always stop it, but you can redirect it. Sherlock made a decision that we'd listen to the wants and needs of protocol teams, even if we didn't always agree with them. Wherever possible, we try to redirect the flow of water to a path that we believe is more secure, but we don't try to stop it. We understand that we cannot be security dictators. If we could, we'd require every audit to have 18 top SRs on the team and last 6 months. Every audit would cost $3M+. Because that's more secure than a 4-person, 2-week audit. We see our customers more as a partnership. We try to guide them in a direction that we think is more secure, but we understand that they have needs and constraints that we need to work within. Only together can we achieve a safer Web3 🛡️