respect for correcting it openly. most people just move on and hope no one notices. the important part here is the shift in methodology. measuring nakamoto coefficient by stake gives a much clearer picture of real control than just counting validators. credit where it’s due to 0xMert for backing it up with actual data. this kind of back and forth is healthy and how the space gets more accurate over time.

Justin Bons
@Justin_Bons
I was wrong about Solana! As I claimed that SOL had a Nakamoto Coefficient of 21
In reality, SOL's NC is 11. A major mistake I am owning up to now!
Credit to @0xMert_ for proving me wrong with good arguments & data
My new NC methodology is based on stake instead of validators:

From Twitter
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments
Share



