Those who support Tinkle and others who maintain open-source software understand one thing: Open source doesn't mean indiscriminate copying, nor does it mean you can erase the original developer team, change a logo, and claim it as your own. The spirit of AGPL has never been about using things freely without communication; it's about maintaining transparency, attribution, and basic respect for the original team while using them. Especially for teams that have completed substantial funding rounds and are listed on major exchanges, they should hold themselves to even higher standards of technical ethics and industry bottom lines. This isn't just a legal issue; it's about the attitude towards the entire open-source and creator ecosystem... We hope the relevant teams will respond positively and handle the matter properly, and we also hope investors and the industry can uphold basic rules to prevent teams that are truly dedicated and committed to long-term projects from being exploited. Respect open source. Respect real builders.