
Bitcoin is at a critical turning point as its price has been trading sideways for weeks while Derivative liquidation has been accumulating, meaning any breakout could trigger significant volatility.
The current context suggests that leverage is being "rebalanced" rather than panic selling. Despite a recent sharp drop, the market reaction has been relatively restrained, raising questions about whether long-term holder confidence (HODLer) is strengthening.
- BTC has been trading sideways around the $85,000 mark for weeks, while accumulated Derivative liquidation could amplify volatility upon a breakout.
- The drop on December 26th triggered the liquidation of Longing positions, but the total liquidation remained low, suggesting a leverage "reset" rather than a panic.
- The Derivative and the decrease in BTC on exchanges support the argument that long-term confidence has not weakened.
Bitcoin is at a volatility breakout point after weeks of sideways movement.
BTC has been fluctuating around $85,000 for about 5 weeks; as Derivative liquidation , a sharp upward or downward movement can quickly turn into a strong swing.
Technically, prolonged sideways chops often determine Bitcoin's next move. This pattern tends to trap late- Futures Contract traders when the price unexpectedly breaks through the range.
In this context, increased liquidation in the Derivative market is crucial: when multiple leveraged positions coexist, a sufficiently strong price shift can trigger a chain of liquidations, amplifying volatility in both directions.
The December 26th crash suggests a leverage reset rather than panic.
On December 26th, BTC dropped 2.22% to $86,000 and "swept" nearly $3,000 in 45 minutes, but total liquidation was only $189 million, indicating that the market had not yet entered a state of widespread panic.
Specifically, the drop resulted in the liquidation of approximately $70 million worth of Longing positions. The initial reaction might have led many to believe that BTC was "revealing its hand" in a downward trend, but the subsequent developments were quite restrained.
Aggregate liquidation data recorded $189 million, while sentiment remained in the "fear" zone. If it were a panic sell-off, we would typically see larger total liquidation and chain reactions, along with more widespread market volatility.
Notably, the ability to withstand a quick shakeout reinforces the argument that the market is repositioning leverage, rather than losing confidence at the structural level.
on-chain cash flow shows that HODLers still have faith.
The amount of BTC on exchanges continued to decline in 2025, with a decrease of approximately 15% and around 430,000 BTC withdrawn from exchanges since April, which is generally XEM as a signal of reduced short-term selling pressure.
One analyst noted that approximately $154 billion in crypto positions have been liquidated YTD. This development, coupled with a 6.34% year-on-year decline in BTC , suggests the market has undergone a "shakeout" process to re-establish positions.
On the exchange reserve side, data on BTC on exchanges shows a prolonged downward trend. As supply on exchanges decreases, the sensitivity of price to spot selling pressure may decrease, especially if selling pressure does not increase proportionally.
The cooling down of Derivative helps reduce the risk of a chain reaction of "position collapses".
BTC 's open interest decreased by approximately $40 billion in Q4 and stood at $56 billion at the time of this article, reflecting a cooling of leverage levels, which could reduce the risk of volatility due to mass liquidations.
BTC Open Interest data shows a significant decrease in Q4. When OI decreases, the market is usually less vulnerable to liquidation sweeps, as the size of active leveraged positions is lower.
With the Derivative cooling down and the amount of BTC on exchanges decreasing, the market structure could be more stable: less excessive leverage, and less supply readily available for immediate sale on exchanges. This doesn't eliminate volatility, but it can limit sudden swings caused by liquidation domino effects.
Recent volatility may be skewed toward short-term macroeconomic pressures.
Recent developments appear more like the impact of short-term macroeconomic pressures than a sign of "losing confidence" among HODLers, which could create a more favorable foundation if the growth cycle returns after the restructuring period.
Within this analytical framework, short-term fluctuations may be reactions to macroeconomic factors and liquidation conditions, rather than reflecting a fundamental shift in the accumulation behavior of long-term investors. A Chia view also leans towards a short-term pressure scenario.
Once the market completes its leverage reset, the likelihood of forming a price base and consolidating may increase. However, the breakout direction still depends on new capital inflows and the macroeconomic context in the next phase.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why can prolonged sideways movement in BTC lead to significant volatility?
When prices move sideways for weeks, pending orders and Derivative positions often accumulate on both sides. A breakout from this range can trigger stop-loss orders and chain liquidations, causing volatility to be amplified rapidly.
What does the $189 million liquidation data tell us?
The total liquidation of $189 million shows that the decline had an impact but was not enough to cause widespread panic. It fits the scenario of a market "resetting" leverage rather than a massive sell-off.
Is a decrease in Open Interest beneficial or detrimental to BTC?
A decrease in open interest typically indicates less excessive leverage, reducing the risk of volatility due to mass liquidations. However, it could also reflect a decrease in speculative activity in the short term.
What does it mean if the amount of BTC on exchanges drops by 15%?
The amount of BTC on exchanges has decreased by approximately 15%, and the withdrawal of 430,000 BTC from exchanges since April is generally interpreted as a reduction in the supply of BTC available for sale. This could support the price if demand does not weaken correspondingly.




