Hmm, so is it possible that the Lighter team has been buying points from users through the OTC market? On one hand, this inflates the product's valuation; on the other hand, it allows them to recoup costs or even make a profit by massively selling off points later? As we all know, OTC trading requires double staking. Massively selling off points prevents sellers from fulfilling their obligations and allows them to profit from penalties. I remember OTC points suddenly jumped from around 10 USDT to 50, then 80, and finally 100. And the trading depth was quite good. Who was continuously selling these points off-exchange? —————————— Thinking back to last year's Hype airdrop, there wasn't this crazy witch-like behavior. Many people, like me, were careless and forgot to register their Hype airdrop addresses, so the Hype team even reopened several more airdrop registration websites. Aster was also very generous. I've been using Aster since it was called Astherus. Although the product was terrible, they kept their promises. There were no witch-like practices, no layers of exploitation of early users, just clean and decisive pump-and-dump schemes. The ALP returns were also astonishing. The core principle of Lighter's success lies in the project team's inherent confidence and resources, eliminating the need for actions that contradict the community's user base to control the token supply and reduce selling pressure. The reluctance to openly launch airdrops also reflects a lack of confidence, doesn't it? It shows a lack of faith in having genuine users and the willingness of anyone to hold their tokens. ———————— Furthermore, the team has been releasing suspiciously positive news through advisors and community leaders. This includes the following two points: 1) The owner, Vlad, has prepared $100 million for a price pump. 2) The team has good relations with the White House and doesn't need to follow Hype's airdrop registration process to declare that users are not American. 3) Lighter will open lower, allowing everyone to buy at the opening. Firstly, anyone with the money to pump a price wouldn't go around saying they have the funds and can pump a price. Who would announce their ability to pump a price to the world? Secondly, projects with good government relations wouldn't boast about who their "big brother" is. Lighter currently exudes an abnormal aura from its team to its airdrop plans. ————————— There are also ardent supporters arguing that killing the studio was the right thing to do. That's even more ridiculous. Their so-called support is simply because Lighter didn't actually kill him. Try deducting his 3000+ points and see what happens. He'd be shouting louder than anyone else. Without the studio, where would the project's false prosperity come from? Without false prosperity, how could they raise another round of VC money? Studios are people too; they manipulate data to prop you up to a position you shouldn't be propped up in. In the end, Lighter is fine; his first move after securing his position was to eliminate his target. ———— Hype and Aster and Lighter are like Palmsa and Stable; the latter is so despicable that no one would believe he has any vision whatsoever. Projects like this are hard to trust after TGE. Of course, we won't use them again.

This reminds me of a certain Shudra project that did a KOL round-robin and told everyone that the opening would bring in 15 billion 😅

He told me it was 80 😂

😂Okay, so you're going to treat people differently based on their status, huh?

The timing is different now. Regardless of the calculation method, he will definitely kill. This is a problem with the control of the single-player currency market.

Indeed, projects that pump and dump are practically trying to squeeze every last drop of capital out of themselves 🤣🤣

After all, your name has "General Manager" in it, so not giving it less than 10b would be a disservice to that "General Manager" 😂

🥲