tl;dr - If you’re a DAO/Protocol looking to execute size w/o multi-sig headaches or getting front-run by bots, let’s talk. -- You might not know this but many DAO's/protocols use @DefinitiveFi for treasury ops (like buybacks). Why protocols are migrating: ⚡ Advanced Algos (Anti-MEV) 👤 Flow Masking (Execution Privacy) 🛡️ Flexible Security (Admin vs. Trader roles) Old Way - Manual DCA via Gnosis Safe / Squads. - Get frontrun and suffer from bad execution - Sign a txn for every single trade/approval. Definitive Way - Automated Institutional TWAP w/ Flow Masking. - Split orders across multiple wallets w/ randomized timing/sizes to stay invisible. - Admins/Multisig control the funds, while Traders execute swaps w/o the need for 3/5 signatures.
DEFINITIVE
@DefinitiveFi
01-14
Onchain treasury operations are inefficient and expensive if done wrong.
Our new case study highlights how projects like @MoonwellDeFi are using Definitive to solve this - automated TWAPs, order flow masking, liquidity aggregation, and institutional controls, all in one x.com/15664199223302…
From Twitter
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments
Share
Relevant content
