The team seems to have misclassified the tokenomics issue. It's not that 8, 8, and 5 are less than the Edjak period. It only fueled unnecessary expectations, and then the community's sentiment turned against them. However, in Edison's recent remarks, This included reviewing transaction patterns, such as extremely short-term BTC transactions or repetitive stablecoin-to-stablecoin transactions that don't resemble actual trading activity. Manual review is used as a verification step to complement automated analysis and is not intended to arbitrarily replace the results. This integrated approach is designed to distinguish long-term ecosystem users from short-term, mechanical, or purely opportunistic participants. There's a lot of talk about Sybil. Why are you talking about this now when you've never talked about it before? You're just sucking up all the fees and pretending to be working for the community? When you needed money and resources to run your app, weren't you the ones who saved you from the fees you earned by making short-term BTC transactions? Don't act all good now. I'm really curious why they differentiate between people who actually use the app and those who make repeat transactions. It makes no sense other than they're saying they've sucked all the money out of it and now they're throwing it away because it's no longer needed. It's truly absurd. Loyalty in a community comes from price.