Don't rush to celebrate on the TermMax Hot List; first separate contribution from action. These days, browsing the @TermMaxFi leaderboard, I've had a very noticeable feeling: some scores rise very quickly, but it's not easy to explain why they're rising. So now when I look at the Hot List, I don't look at the rankings first; I only look at whether it's long-term value or short-term action. I generally only look at whether the transactions resemble genuine demand, whether the interaction spreads naturally, and whether there's retention after the window closes. If any of these don't match, even a high score is questionable. Many strong trends are actually not difficult to identify, such as small, high-frequency repetitive transactions, large nominal volume but low real cost, simultaneous actions across multiple wallets, a surge before settlement followed by a drop to zero, and dense content without new information. These are more like actions driven by incentives, not necessarily genuine contributions. Therefore, I increasingly recognize the value of the Hot List: it's not about who's number one, but about whose growth can be clearly explained. Only those who can explain it clearly will stay. If your score hasn't been moving much lately, don't rush to post more. First, ensure that each piece of content has a record, new information, and clear boundaries. It's okay to be slow; your real score will catch up eventually. #TermMax #InvestmentResearchProject This tweet does not constitute any investment advice. Cryptocurrency carries risks; invest with caution. twitter.com/Domingo_gou/status...

lets goo

Do I need Trump's WeChat?

@AIxC_Official @aixcfoundation #Tenki Give it a try