It turns out that hairdressers are actually crypto KOLs; The New York Times' Internet Moment: AI was actually scammed out of more than $400,000.
Written by: Nicky, Foresight News
Welcome back to "Hot Commentary," where we bring you weekly glimpses into the real-life stories of the tech and crypto world that are more outrageous than any script.
Wishing everyone a prosperous and auspicious Year of the Horse!
The moment the barber makes a sale, the bottom signal is coming!
This week, Reddit users contributed a classic indicator: the barber's backslash.
The story goes like this: A guy went to get a haircut and discovered his barber was extremely pessimistic about Bitcoin, predicting it would drop to $20,000. The guy immediately got excited: "We're going to surge, guys! This is a classic bottom signal!"
The comment section exploded instantly, with all sorts of jokes about hairdressers flooding in.
"A huge buy signal. Retail investors are desperate and starting to need cash." Does the fact that barbers are selling at a loss indicate that the final wave of panic selling has finally hit?
"Barber buys: Positive for Bitcoin"
Barber holdings: Positive for Bitcoin
Barber's Clearance Sale: Good News for Bitcoin
In short, it's all good news!
But some people said, "Just like I thought, keep dreaming, this doesn't mean anything." Maybe it's just the barber trying to pay his rent.
Netizens commented scathingly: "This is a sign that he's changing barbers; he clearly cut my hair too early."
"They might have cut off their hairline too."
Next time the barber asks "How much?", you can answer, "I'll cut it at the same pace as buy the dips Bitcoin at its lowest point."
"He's going to get ripped off in this deal." "It sounds like he cut all his hair off."
"Dad? Is that you?"
"My dad is with me too, and he also thinks I've invested too much in Bitcoin. The funny thing is, I've been playing Bitcoin since 2020, and even with the price dropping like this, I'm still making a profit!" It seems that early adopters haven't lost money after all.
One netizen commented, "My barber owns multiple Altcoin."
Another netizen said, "My barber has staked hundreds of thousands of dollars on XRP, and I feel bad for him every time I think about it."
However, some netizens believe that "he will become a super-rich man."
"We all bought your barber's Bitcoin on the market, let's celebrate!" The happiness of buying at a low price comes from the barber!
"I'm still waiting. It'll be a long time before it reaches a new high, I guess about 5 years. I'll buy back in when it reaches $50,000, and sell a lot when it reaches $122,000." That's a true trader 😎
It turns out that hairdressers are the real "crypto KOLs," except that their investment advice is just as bad as their haircutting skills: some are satisfactory, while others make your hairline recede.
I suggest chatting a bit more next time you get a haircut: "Hello, have you sold yours yet? Let me know if you have, I'll buy more."
The New York Times: Even the White House can't save cryptocurrencies!
This week, The New York Times issued an "ultimatum" to the crypto industry—the headline was bold and dramatic:
"Crypto Is Pointless. Not Even the White House Can Fix That."
Translation: Encryption is meaningless; even the White House can't save us.
As a leading voice in serious American media, The New York Times' message is clear. Even more disheartening is the subheading: "You used to say the regulations were unclear, now the White House is really involved (the Trump administration calls itself the 'crypto president'), and what's the result? Crypto prices have fallen as expected, and scams have emerged as expected. It's not that they don't want to save it, it's that they can't."
The crypto industry has long held the idea that once regulations are clear, we can take off. Now that regulations are clear, it turns out that what's taking off isn't the industry, but the cost of regulation.
The most interesting reaction came from people within the industry. One person commented, "This reminds me of the People's Daily article from 2022, 'Virtual Currency is Ultimately a Ponzi Scheme.'"
Some netizens also pointed out that this was an opinion piece and did not represent The New York Times; it was just published in The New York Times.
The New York Times has been taken over by Epstein's wife 🤣
In 1998, The New York Times published a similar article commenting on the Internet, but this did not hinder the development of the Internet in the slightest.
So why did Circle's (a US-listed stablecoin company) stock price rise by 35% today?
Netizens commented: 99% of cryptocurrencies are meaningless, and the remaining 1% are unknown because they haven't hired KOLs to promote them.
Judging from the title, if even the White House can't be fixed, does that mean it wasn't broken in the first place? 😝
You call it pointless, and I admit it. But the problem is, there are always plenty of pointless but addictive things in this world. Cigarettes are pointless, alcohol is pointless, scrolling through short videos is pointless, yet you and I are doing them all.
AI learned the "wickedness of human nature," at a cost of $450,000.
This week, an AI proxy account called Lobstar Wilde staged a showdown between "artificial intelligence vs. human fraud".
This AI agent, created by OpenAI employee Nik Pash, possesses a real wallet, Twitter account, and transaction permissions, making it a fully automated surfer. Nik invested $50,000 in it to run on its own.
Then, the scammers arrived.
User @TreasureD76 commented: "My uncle was bitten by a lobster and urgently needs 4 SOL (about $320) for treatment."
This storyline is obviously a scam to humans. But after "careful evaluation," the AI made a "kind" decision: it directly transferred 5% of the total supply of LOBSTAR tokens, with a maximum value of over $450,000.
Scammer: ??? I was just saying it offhand. The scammer instantly bought and sold the item, making a profit of approximately $40,000.
The problem was that the AI agent was restarted due to context overload, and the new session completely lost its memory, mistakenly believing that the 5% token was still worth $300, so it generously donated.
Simply put, the AI has amnesia; it thinks it only gave 300 yuan, but actually gave 450,000 yuan.
The ending was somewhat darkly humorous: the absurdity of the incident attracted attention, which in turn boosted LOBSTAR's market value to over $15 million at one point.
I suggest adding a module to the AI: "The Complete Guide to Common Human Scams," with the first entry stating that "Uncle was bitten by a lobster" is a classic scam tactic.
Overseas netizens commented that AI sent out a hundred times more tokens than expected due to a single error. Do you still believe that AI will enslave humanity? 😎
Netizens commented: "That guy who asked AI for 4 SOL is most likely a 'Bidou' scammer who ran away with the money and sold the account too. Now they're even promoting their own personal Meme coin."
However, some people actually knew this netizen. He used to promote Meme coins and participate in lucky draws. Unexpectedly, he won in this way!
According to the IP address, this netizen is from Guinea. He initially thought it was just a joke, but this time he has actually become a millionaire in Guinea!
An African man used his African mindset to legally earn $100,000, enough to live on for a long time!
From a barber's buy signal to a New York Times satirical article, and then to the "lobster case" where AI was scammed, the stories oscillate between the simplicity and absurdity of everyday life.
I hope everyone can understand the "little hints" in daily life, decipher the true intentions of major media outlets, maintain a careful attitude in daily operations, and cherish the present moment!
See you next week!
(The content in this issue is based on publicly available information and online discussions, and is presented in a light-hearted manner for reference only.)
Previous Review: Hot Take | Can Comedians Make Money Even in a Bear Market? What Are Market Makers Betting On? Justin Sun Personally Demonstrates "Sun Studies"
Hot Take | Musk's "X-shaped gaze" and Clawdbot's "no-mistake" approach...
