According to TechFlow TechFlow, on April 4th, Wang Chun, co-founder of F2Pool, published an article on the X platform stating that Bitcoin protocol upgrades should not follow the approach of using "bundled legislation" to forcefully push forward, similar to the methods used by American politicians. This is a key reason for his opposition to BIP-110 and BIP-54. Many of the discussed issues lack real urgency: for example, while "timewarp attacks" have existed for a long time, they do not substantially help miners' profits; block verification efficiency has been significantly improved due to libsecp256k1 and hardware upgrades, requiring no protocol-level adjustments; and "forging confirmed transactions" essentially relies on cracking double SHA256 collisions, which, if successful, would mean that Bitcoin's core security has been compromised. Wang Chun added that none of the above issues are sufficient to drive protocol modification; currently, only the "duplicate transactions" issue has some value for fixing and may be one of the few changes worth implementing.
F2Pool co-founder Wang Chun: Bitcoin protocol upgrades should not be forced through a "bundling bill" approach.
This article is machine translated
Show original
Sector:
Source
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments
Share
Relevant content




