[Then, are utility coin paybacks from projects other than KAST okay?] This is actually better. It's just a matter of moving funds from one pocket to another. Also, as payments become more active, the tx (funds for buybacks) indirectly increases in the case of Crypto.com. In the case of Etherfi, you can at least force a correlation: DeFi TVL increase -> Assets Under Management increase -> Fee revenue increase -> Etherfi price increase. However, no matter how you look at it, KAST is a disaster that offers absolutely no help to Movement holders. We must block this kind of thing with regulations so that our "altcoin market" can survive. I view KAST as a project that uses token holders as cannon fodder.