Tether Supports Drift Recovery… Aiming for USDT Dominance on Solana?

This article is machine translated
Show original

Tether has stepped forward to support the recovery plan of Drift Protocol, a Solana-based perpetual exchange. This move comes after the loss of approximately $285 million in an attack believed to be carried out by North Korean-linked hackers on April 1, with the focus placed on "USDT expansion" and "increasing Solana's market share" rather than simple compensation.

Switching to USDT as settlement asset… Moving to shake USDC's dominance

According to foreign media reports, Drift is pushing to switch payment assets from USDC to USDT through a reward scheme. Tether claims that this will attract over 128,000 users and more than 35 ecosystem teams to USDT-based transactions. Currently, in the global stablecoin market, USDT significantly outperforms USDC ($79 billion) with a market capitalization of $185 billion, but the situation is different in Solana. With USDC’s market cap at $8.1 billion—approximately 2.65 times larger than USDT’s at around $3.05 billion—this move is also being interpreted as a battle for dominance within Solana.

XRP, Focus on Real-World Value Over Charts… Interpretation as Institutional Payment Infrastructure Highlighted

View full Alpha Report →

Drift recovery is transaction-based recovery, not 'full compensation'

This recovery plan does not involve immediately returning the hacked losses like cash. Instead, it is structured to redirect exchange profits toward recovery resources and gradually inject external funding based on performance. DeFiLlama’s 0xngmi described this approach as being “closer to a structure where losses are recovered only through trading on Drift.” Drift also plans to deposit a portion of fees and external funds into a ‘recovery pool’ and design tokens to distribute to victims. Prior to the hack, Drift’s Total Value Locked (TVL) stood at $550 million, placing it among the top protocols in the Solana ecosystem.

Criticism of circles reignited… Controversy over failure to freeze spreads

This incident is also placing a burden on Circle, the issuer of USDC. Blockchain investigator ZachXBT has consistently raised concerns about Circle's passive approach to freezing the hacked funds. Recently, there have also been reports that a class-action lawsuit has been filed against Circle regarding fund transfers using CCTP. Amidst the ongoing controversy surrounding the tracking and freezing of the hacked funds, Tether's response is interpreted as a strategic move to expand USDT's presence on Solana, going beyond mere recovery support.


Article Summary by TokenPost.ai 🔎 Market Analysis : Tether is aiming to expand USDT's market share within the Solana ecosystem, going beyond simple hack recovery support. This is a strategic move to shift the landscape in the Solana market, where USDC currently holds the advantage, by transitioning payment assets. 💡 Strategic Points : Naturally absorb liquidity by converting drift users to a USDT-based system. Maintain and expand platform activity through a transaction-inducing recovery structure rather than direct rewards. Expand ecosystem influence by leveraging TVL top protocols within Solana. 📘 Glossary : USDT: A dollar-pegged stablecoin issued by Tether, holding the No. 1 global market share. USDC: A stablecoin issued by Circle, known for its strong regulation-friendly image. TVL: The total assets deposited in a protocol, serving as an indicator of a project's influence. Perpetual Trading: A derivative transaction that allows the maintenance of leveraged positions without a maturity date.

💡 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q. Why is converting to USDT important after the Drift hack?
This transition is not merely a technical change but is directly linked to the competition for market share. While USDC is dominant on Solana, Tether is pursuing a strategy to simultaneously expand its liquidity and influence by guiding Drift users to USDT.
Q. Can the victims receive compensation immediately?
No. This recovery method is not an immediate cash reward, but rather a structure that gradually recovers funds based on exchange revenue and external capital. In other words, the speed of rewards is affected as platform activity continues.
Q. Why are Circle and USDC being criticized?
The main controversy is that the freezing of the hacked funds was not sufficient. Some argue that the response to tracking and blocking the funds was inadequate, leading to issues of trust and even legal disputes.
TP AI Note: This article has been summarized using a language model based on TokenPost.ai. Key content of the text may be omitted or inaccurate.
This article is based on market data and chart analysis and does not constitute investment advice for any specific stock.

<Copyright ⓒ TokenPost, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited>

#Tether #DriftProtocol #Solana #USDT #USDC #Stablecoin #Hacking

Sector:
Source
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
85
Add to Favorites
15
Comments