avatar
Biteye
Follow
Biteye是亚洲领先Web3研究平台,专注AI/L1/L2/RWA/DeFi, 提供空投/项目研报/二级市场分析等Alpha机会,覆盖超30万用户! 由香港数码港 @cyberport_hk 孵化 💡TG https://t.co/mMHrEehLjA 官方链接:https://t.co/ALFDHF9pG2
Posts
avatar
Biteye
02-07
"A Glimmer of Hope: China Securities Regulatory Commission Gives Green Light to Domestic Assets Issuing Overseas Tokens" Breaking News! Just yesterday, eight ministries issued Document No. 42, continuing and strengthening their high-pressure policies on domestic virtual currencies. However, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) immediately released the "Regulatory Guidelines on the Issuance of Asset-Backed Securities Tokens Overseas by Domestic Assets," providing clear guidance for domestic institutions issuing RWA tokens overseas. This is considered a major positive development for the RWA or crypto sector, as it marks the first time the Chinese government has offered positive policy guidance on tokens (albeit for overseas tokens). Previously, all official documents adopted a negative attitude and imposed high-pressure policies on tokens. This represents a significant policy shift, indicating that while the government prohibits RWA domestically, it acknowledges the potential value of international RWA to the domestic economy. The regulatory guidelines are less than 3 pages long, so we recommend reading them word for word. Here are 3 key points: 1. Definition of token issuance: "Tokenized equity certificates issued overseas using cryptographic technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies, backed by cash flow generated from domestic assets or related asset rights." Essentially, they still have securities characteristics. 2. Compliance with regulations: Strict compliance with laws and regulations concerning cross-border investment, foreign exchange management, network and data security is required. 3. Prior registration required: Domestic entities must register with the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC). Approval will be published on the website. The next step is to see which domestic companies will be approved. However, we also want to remind everyone that the term RWA does not appear in the official document, indicating that the authorities do not particularly endorse this term and do not consider RWA equivalent to "asset-backed security tokens." twitter.com/BiteyeCN/status/20...
loading indicator
Loading..