I agree with this speech in full
Even with the nested transaction part, of which I have been a critic of, probably the number one critic there, and if even after my concerns and alternatives, now acknowledged, nested transactions are the chosen solution, so be it.
I was also wrong about the sovereign wealth fund; in that case, I was able to recognise my mistake before voting ended and was able to change to abstain, and considering a yes.
I'm doing this, hopefully, as an example to other community members.
It is ok to acknowledge being wrong.
It is ok to recognise that maybe I was missing some information in the past.
It is ok to step back and give the benefit of the doubt, even if I'm absolutely certain that I'm 100% correct (with probably missing information still).
As far as I'm concerned, anyone building and truly innovating on Cardano is a good actor.
