KK.aWSB

KK.aWSB

11,360 Twitter followers

Follow

@Wagmi33Fund,@aWSBclub_cn ,NFTs OG ,BAYC #5226,#BTC is future，Last guardian of the $people

Posts

In 1968, in Riceville, a small town in Iowa, third-grade teacher Jane Eliot walked into her classroom. The day before, Martin Luther King Jr. had been assassinated. The children asked her, "Why did someone want to kill him?" Jane Eliot didn't answer. Instead, she told the class, "Today we're going to do an experiment." She divided the class into two groups: blue-eyed and brown-eyed. On the first day, she announced, "Blue-eyed children are smarter and more capable. They can play five more minutes during recess, eat lunch first, and drink water from the water dispenser. Brown-eyed children cannot." Within just one morning, changes occurred. The blue-eyed children became arrogant and aggressive, beginning to mock their brown-eyed classmates. The brown-eyed children became silent and insecure, even experiencing a significant drop in their test scores. Children who were once best friends began to hate each other within hours. The next day, Jane Eliot reversed the rules: "I was wrong yesterday. The brown-eyed children are actually superior." Everything immediately reversed. The brown-eyed children became arrogant, while the blue-eyed children crumbled instantly. Two days later, she ended the experiment and had all the children sit together. She said: "What you felt these past two days is what Black people feel every day. No one is superior or inferior because of the color of their eyes, and no one is noble or lowly because of the color of their skin." The classroom was quiet, and several children cried. This is the famous "blue/brown eye" experiment in educational history. Jane Eliot later appeared on ABC television, and the experiment was made into a documentary, *The Divided Classroom*, which aired globally for decades. More than fifty years later, children from that class were interviewed and said: "Those two days changed my life. I have never judged anyone by their appearance again." The moral of this story is: 🥳 Prejudice doesn't need a reason, just a label. A teacher spent two days teaching an 8-year-old a lesson that an adult might spend a lifetime learning: you don't need to belittle anyone to prove your worth, because no one is born inferior.

Palantir CEO Alex Karp made a jarring statement to Silicon Valley investors. AI is striking precisely at the core of the Democratic Party's electorate: highly educated urban white-collar professionals. Meanwhile, manual laborers, whom AI cannot replace, are seeing their relative power rise. He said those who believe this kind of disruption is "politically controllable" are "in a mental hospital." Then he turned to Silicon Valley: You can't destroy millions of professional jobs with AI while refusing to support its military applications. His logic is—the only socially acceptable reason for AI is national security. Otherwise, the public will sooner or later demand direct government intervention in these companies. Those who create chaos must explain why the chaos is worthwhile.

Breaking news: Zuckerberg's $14.3 billion AI chief was sidelined after just 9 months? Alexandr Wang, founder of Scale AI, is 29 years old and the highest-paid executive in Meta's history. He joined the company last June and took charge of the Meta Super Intelligence Lab, enjoying a period of great success. Now: Meta has established a new Applied AI Engineering department, which reports directly to the CTO, bypassing Wang; its researchers now report to other executives; even the AI chief scientist, LeCun, would rather resign than report to him. Meta officially denied the allegations, stating, "This is completely false; Alex's influence is expanding." But the person who bought it for 14.3 billion was given parallel power within 9 months— Denial, or is it a case of "there's no truth to it"? Zuckerberg's logic has always been clear: metaverse doesn't work, cut it; if the people don't work, replace them. There are no sunk costs, only the next gamble.

The core team of Alibaba's Qianwen (千问) team resigned en masse, prompting Wu Yongming to hold an emergency all-staff meeting. Timeline: March 2nd: Qwen 3.5 released, Elon Musk praised it. March 3rd: Lin Junyang tweeted "bye my beloved qwen". March 4th: Wu Yongming, Jiang Fang, and Zhou Jingren held an all-staff meeting to quell the controversy. What happened? Tongyi Labs decided to break up the previously vertically integrated Qwen team into horizontal groups for pre-training, post-training, and multimodal tasks. Lin Junyang's management scope was reduced. Zhou Hao, a former DeepMind researcher, was parachuted in to take over post-training, reporting directly to Zhou Jingren. Even more devastating was the change in performance metrics—from model performance and open-source influence to the Qianwen App's DAU and commercial revenue. Asking a technical lead with six years of open-source experience to boost C-end DAU is tantamount to undermining someone's authority. A colleague's comment put it clearly: "Leaving wasn't his choice." The HR representative made a blunt statement at the meeting: "We can't elevate people to a pedestal, and the company can't accept irrational demands to retain them." Open-source ideals clashed with the KPIs of a large company; separation was inevitable.

me stepping down. bye my beloved qwen.

This is a newly released image from NASA, titled: "A Rose from the Universe." It's a photograph taken by the Hubble Space Telescope. Two galaxies are approaching each other 300 million light-years apart, their gravity stretching their spiral arms into a petal shape. The top galaxy is UGC 1810, and the bottom one is UGC 1813. They are merging and will eventually become one galaxy. The universe has spent hundreds of millions of years drawing this flower, a most incredible and romantic sight in deep space.

Loading..