Classic libertarianism does not have an answer for the post-enlightenment discovery that WASP norms are non-universal, exploitable by defectors and cannot be simply mutualism-ed into a social contract without a very explicit demographic reckoning; anarchism faced a postanarchism contention with the deconstruction of the individual as an independent actor, but also failed to contend with hard biological realities besides descending into deluded marxist wishful thinking; neither are in case relevant to actual political reality, which is effectiveness in either (1) collapse patchwork (the answer is ethnic warbands) or (2) post nation state independent urban polities hosting transnational clades (the answer is mormonesque sovereign cults); political theory does however remain relevant to the organization of virtual communities, but those too should be focused first on achieving sovereignty as states, which means first sustaining a defensible economy (virtual monopoly on violence is in financial seizure). Online political theory debates are an irrelevant game except for that contending to either virtual organization or collapse enclave prep.
