avatar
冰蛙
27,436 Twitter followers
Follow
擅长撸毛。 微信：_2Jaygun 只交朋友，不接推广。
Posts
avatar
冰蛙
01-30
Thread
Looking back on the past two years, I'm incredibly lucky to have avoided at least 80% of the major investment scams. Even projects that many people around me highly recommended and heavily invested in ultimately resulted in losses, yet I managed to avoid them all! 😂 And it's not that I was unaware of these scams; I participated in quite a few projects each year, and I basically read, researched, and even advised against them on some, and sometimes even heavily invested in them. I don't know why, but I just had a gut feeling that something was off, but I couldn't quite put my finger on it—it was purely a feeling, without any basis. It's strange, but I just luckily avoided them. I wonder if it's because I've been involved in so many scams for years, seeing thousands upon thousands of projects, that I have this feeling—like when your English teacher always talks about "feeling" for a particular language—maybe I have a knack for avoiding scams. 😂 Although I've pursued legal action against so many projects, I haven't participated in the vast majority of them. Maybe I have some kind of magic formula for avoiding scams. 😂
BTC
0.8%
avatar
冰蛙
01-27
Thread
Space's rights protection progress: The project's official website has been updated, and refund applications can now be submitted. Large investors will receive approximately 20% back, and small investors approximately 70%. Users applying for a refund must first accept the terms, but these are unfair terms. In short: You can get a refund, but forget about your coins. It's like investing $100,000 and only getting $20,000 back—nothing more. It's practically a surrender clause. And the terms can be changed at any time. Whether or not to agree to the terms and apply for a refund is entirely up to you; I will not offer any advice. I, IceFrog, will continue to fight for my rights to the end. My demand is clear: a 100% refund. I cannot guarantee a successful rights protection effort, and it is highly likely to fail. Even if I succeed through legal means, I may not necessarily recover my funds. For me personally, fighting for my rights is not just about standing up for myself; I will not tolerate such rampant and unscrupulous fraudsters in the industry.
avatar
冰蛙
01-23
Thread
Space's rights protection progress: Just now, someone claiming to be relaying a message from the Space project team sent a message, as shown in the image. This message seems purely for maintaining stability; it lacks any real focus and simply tells you not to cause trouble. What's the point of calculating data? The on-chain data is crystal clear. You still want to calculate the data when it's right in front of you? Do you want me to do the calculation for you? Today, the rights protection group has collected a large amount of information about the project team. Various IPO platforms, partners, institutions… are all in contact and communication. Furthermore, on-chain data has been found to show addresses belonging to the project team that have been withdrawing funds from exchanges. Even if you hide your identity perfectly, after all these years, you're bound to get your shoes wet. If the project team is unethical, the community will definitely have a hundred ways to put them in jail. Which is stronger, decentralized fraud or centralized coercive measures?
avatar
冰蛙
01-22
Thread
"Another Scam: Why is intodotspace a Typical Example of a Rug Project in the Last Two Years?" A project engaging in rug scams often exhibits certain typical characteristics. Currently, it seems highly likely that intodotspace is trying to extort money from rug users. Using this project as an example, let's highlight some warning signs to avoid falling victim. I. Warning Sign: Extremely Aggressive Persona Building and Frequent Changes in Sector Focus This is almost a classic starting point for all rug projects. Then it's the same old three things: build up a background, emphasize community priority, and elaborate on product philosophy. Everything presents a familiar decentralized image, but this decentralization carries an overly ingratiating, unusually righteous tone. If you look at its past, if you can't find the founder's real resume, the project frequently changes sectors, and it's still essentially in the PowerPoint stage, yet spends a lot of money hiring KOLs, then you should be suspicious of this project. II. Warning Sign: Unexpected Rule Changes and Forced Explanations Intodotspace is very obvious in this regard. If you carefully read its posts... They introduced the concept of "hard cap" and "soft cap" in fundraising, using the guise of "industry practice" to mislead investors. This essentially means that before fundraising, the team's mindset was: "I'll collect the money first, and then see how much I keep." At this point, they usually respond to market skepticism by issuing refunds. However, if you investigate the refunds closely, various shady practices will surface. Either the refunds were accidentally sent to a new address, or accidentally to an exchange. In short, they never reached your original wallet. Third, the "silencing the fire" and harvesting: Shouting slogans and refunding large investors. This step is basically the final stage, and they will definitely release a high-sounding statement. "We won't run away, we are very transparent, everything we do is for the good of small investors. We're using this money to make a really awesome product, and we'll be TGE soon." At this point, the situation is very clear; Rug is almost in its final stage. Even if they do refund under pressure, the project will likely change its identity and start a new story. I hope everyone will protect their wallets. In a bad market, projects that talk a lot of big ideas but don't take any real action are basically going to be put on the danger watch list.
avatar
冰蛙
01-21
Thread
Musk's interview essentially represents his views on the ultimate fate of the X algorithm. In short, the current X algorithm is still fundamentally based on dwell time. To make the data look better, much content is forced to be artificially dulled under the algorithm's pressure, which is why motivational articles are so prevalent. Therefore, Grok, trained on such data, can only be artificially dulled as well. Especially when the entire platform is flooded with homogenized content generated to attract traffic, the value of X's data assets is actually discounted. Musk's analogy of truth and curiosity, in my view, is guidance for the future of algorithms. I predict that future algorithms will, in addition to dwell time, truly implement the concept of "users staying without regret." For example, reducing the weight of duplicate content and rewarding content that provides fresh perspectives and high information density. Because from Musk's perspective, X is part of the business model, but in a higher sense, it is Grok's real-time database. This means that each iteration of the algorithm is no longer essentially for simple traffic monetization, but for data cleaning for AI.
Mario Nawfal
@MarioNawfal
01-21
ELON: TRUTH AND CURIOSITY KEEP AI SANE “Truth will prevent AI from going insane. Curiosity will foster any form of sentience. We’re more interesting than a bunch of rocks. If it’s curious, it will foster humanity. If it has a sense of beauty, it will be a great future.
loading indicator
Loading..