Web3空投姐💸

Web3空投姐💸

66,706 Twitter followers

Follow

Posts

Web3空投姐💸

Don't think of Ferra as a more complex DEX; it's actually selling a programmable liquidity toolkit. I admit I initially frowned when I saw DLMM/CLMM/DAMM. Those three abbreviations made it seem like I was being forced to endorse something. But after testing it, Ferra's main message isn't about having many features, but rather that you shouldn't just come here to exchange tokens; you can use liquidity like building blocks. 1. The three engines aren't just for show; they give you three entry points for different ways to play the game. You don't need to memorize the details of each engine right now. Just remember that many DEXs rely on a single approach. Ferraa directly acknowledges that assets are different, and market-making methods shouldn't be one-size-fits-all. Therefore, it gives you three entry points; you choose according to your acceptable risk and playstyle. 2. What truly elevates it to the infrastructure level is the toolchain behind it. Frankly, everyone can talk about the three engines. But what really impressed me about Ferra is that it provides a complete guide on how to use it: ▪️DBC: Projects don't have to start from scratch with tedious contract writing; instead, it streamlines the asset issuance/liquidity activation process. ▪️Aggregation Routing: You don't need to compare pools yourself; transactions automatically take the optimal path. ▪️API/SDK: This is crucial. It's not just advertised on a poster; it's a practical tool for developers. These three elements together constitute a Liquidity Stack. Otherwise, it's just a multi-engine DEX. 3. To determine if it's truly running, I suggest you don't just focus on TVL. When running these protocols, I habitually check three things first; otherwise, I feel uneasy: ▪️TVL size (Don't fool yourself) ▪️Trading volume/turnover (Is it being used repeatedly?) ▪️Protocol revenue/commission (Is there any real cash flow?) You can find all three on DefiLlama. Checking them yourself will be a hundred times more reliable than me claiming it's powerful. 4. Some useful criticisms: The most pressing issue right now is the jarring feel. I'm not defending anyone regarding the negative aspects of the community, but they do exist: ▪️The perceived difficulty of using the Lucky Wheel ▪️Minor interactive bugs (like clicking without response – these are incredibly frustrating) ▪️Guild's exit costs/cooldown period are unfriendly to those with small capital. I actually hope Ferra treats these issues as essential, making the prompts clearer, reducing the risk of accidental clicks, and improving the exit mechanism. These aren't just superficial improvements; they're about retention. @ferra_protocol #Sui #DeFi #Liquidity #AMM #Composability #SocialDEX twitter.com/webktsr/status/201...

Web3空投姐💸

This is the first time I've seen this in DeFi: Posting can now be monthly-paid! Today I saw an update from @FerraFeeds: W11 bonus fees are now claimable. The leaderboard shows Cetus first, Ferra Ignition second, and DAL third. I was stunned, not because of who was first. But because of the word "claimable." This immediately means one thing: Ferra isn't just creating hype for you; it's settling accounts. To be honest, I haven't seen a SocialFi platform where you can actually reconcile your payments in a long time. Before, we were busy posting, interacting, and recruiting. And then what? Gain some followers, and the rest was entirely dependent on the platform. If the platform changes its rules or cuts its API, all your previous efforts are wiped out. But Ferra's W11 announcement means something simple: some of what you do in Guild can be claimed and reconciled. This experience is like doing volunteer work before. Now you can get a payslip. So what exactly is Feeds Premium selling? Let me put it simply. I'm always wary of memberships/subscriptions. Most of them are just fluff. But this Premium thing is worth a closer look, because it feels more like a business deal, not just a freebie. The key points you can find on the official page are: ▪️3x points ▪️15% trading fee cashback ▪️3% bonus fees (based on your already earned yield) In short, it's not about getting you to post more. It's saying that if you're already trading/LP on Ferra, I'll give you less friction and more return. Is it worth it? Don't ask me. Ask your transaction fees. My own principle when running projects is: do the math first, then get excited. You can use a very basic but useful way to judge: what were your trading fees/LP fees on Ferra over the past 7 days? Can the 15% cashback break even on the subscription cost? Yes, consider it as opening a cashback valve for yourself. No, don't pretend to be a big spender. Seriously, don't mess with your wallet. I have to say a few things, otherwise it feels too fake. What's most frustrating about Ferra right now isn't the rewards. It's the lack of trust. Here are a few practical points: ▪️Don't make the points weighting too opaque. What behaviors count as effective contributions? Can you give a general range? ▪️The UI could be much more user-friendly. I want to see points/rewards/ranking/claim progress on one screen, instead of making me jump back and forth. ▪️How will the cashback be balanced in the long run? Don't let it turn into a pointless argument about unclear calculations. I'm not being dissident. I'm the kind of person who will close the page if I get stuck halfway through. You know what I mean, right? Many SocialFi platforms are emotional games; Ferra is more like turning attention into a system with a tangible cash flow. You can fake excitement, but you can't fake claimability. @ferra_protocol @FerraFeeds #Ferra #Sui #DeFi #CreatorFi #SocialFi twitter.com/webktsr/status/201...

-- END --