Seeing the price of a certain cryptocurrency is quite disappointing. This is my biggest single loss, purely a consequence of paying for the brand's actions. Looking back, the main problem was the emotional disconnect. Listing it on the spot market too late was problematic. Listing Chinese characters isn't technically difficult, but the delay exhausted everyone's enthusiasm. If we had listed it on the spot market quickly after the alpha, everyone would have recognized its value, and the market's collective strength would have made it a 1B coin. Those who made money would have been grateful to the brand. The BSC primary market would be very different now. It could have essentially reclaimed a large portion of Sol's market share.
Many foundations were involved in pumping up the price of Sol at the time, bringing in new investors with compelling narratives. The official stance wasn't that retail investors were afraid of making money, as Sol's price had already multiplied their initial investment. Furthermore, a certain platform was promoting the meme sector at the time. NB's price rose from over 800 to over 1300. The value contribution of memes cannot be ignored.
The next step would be for the official team to guide the transition, gradually supporting a shift to the community level after the official support has been established. This would be a better option. Just like parents can't raise children forever, they need to nurture and care for them in the early stages, but once the children grow up, they can develop on their own (as part of the community).
At the time, I thought that since a certain company had listed its products with a brand name, there would at least be some support to prevent the price from falling below the initial listing price and making things look bad. This was indeed wishful thinking on the part of retail investors; there was no support whatsoever. They simply held onto their shares without trying to pump the price up.
If everything is done in accordance with market behavior and without interference, wouldn't it be better to use Hakimi?
This is the stock with the most retail investors in the primary market, and the one that receives the most love and support from investors. Almost everyone in the primary market who hasn't bought this stock has seen it rise to a peak of 80 million, a truly unique and top-tier domestic IP that has risen on its own merits.
Self-propagating meme without any brand disputes
Memes that can still maintain their popularity for over ten years
Overall, he wasn't any worse than Doge Pepe, but the result is disheartening, as everyone knows. All the effort went to waste.
This contradicts the community support theory that someone mentioned. Of course, it's not about moral blackmail; whether you participate or not is indeed your freedom. It's just that things aren't developing in a positive direction.
Later, after seeing Nina's comment about the "wild manipulator theory," I realized that BSC's manipulators are divided into state-owned enterprise manipulators and wild manipulators. We can't control what the wild manipulators like Hakimi do, but at least we state-owned enterprise manipulators can control the direction of Binance's Life. So we gave up on Hakimi. But the problem is that state-owned enterprise manipulators, your brand Life didn't live up to expectations in the end. They clearly had a lot of tokens, but they were afraid of pumping the price and losing money. In conclusion, I feel that Binance's operation is very unsuccessful, especially with their own products like Palu and BNBholder. In the end, they didn't even provide a contract. It's so bizarre that I don't know what to say. The current problem is that even the market value ceiling of Binance's two sacred entities is very low because everyone still believes in and likes to play with the two sacred entities. However, if the official ceiling is not opened, it will more or less affect some pure meme community projects. Now, CZ's English book is the last batch of users who believe in the official BSC. If you want to do it, go for it. Whether it's promoting the book market or Binance's original intention, it's worth doing.
There's still a sense of hesitation and uncertainty about how things are going. Maybe it's because the book hasn't been officially released yet and they haven't put in the effort. Also, forcibly changing the narrative of "A Certain Life" into the narrative of a book is actually wrong. Because "A Certain Life's" narrative isn't a book at all. This forced diversion will drag down the market value of CZ's English books.
Yesterday, two non-Ersheng (a type of investment product) M-listed companies in the primary market, Aiwuwu and Niuyangge, were very good news. Regardless of the outcome, it's commendable that someone is willing to take action. Only when these listings are successful will retail investors have more opportunities. Yesterday, I had some prejudice, thinking the Niuyangge listing wasn't aesthetically pleasing. Now, I realize its rise was actually due to Xiaoyi CTO. Even if the listing is called Errenzhuan (a type of folk performance), or something like "Little Sheep Loves Fish," the name doesn't matter; what matters is Xiaoyi CTO.
The fundamental issue is people: who is the CTO?
I've said before that buying CTO tokens is actually buying a person, not just a token. I buy them because I trust the person's character and abilities.
Aiwuwu is also an official account that has been interacting with users. Yesterday, it posted around 100k tweets. From a product promotion perspective, Aiwuwu's logic is not harmful.
Moreover, the official account feels very real and engaging. It's rare to see such consistent interaction; otherwise, every extra word from an Official Twitter account is considered a blessing.
keep it up
