<div><style>
    .source {
      font-size: 0;
    }
    .source a {
      display: inline-block;
      vertical-align: bottom;
    }
    .source img {
      pointer-events: none;
      border-radius: 50%;
      vertical-align: bottom;
      padding: 2px;
      display: inline;
      margin: 0;
    }
  </style>
<h3>Fireline Report</h3>
<p>Fourmeme launched a "name protection" mechanism, banning tokens with the same name within 72 hours. Community diversion sentiment intensified, and the chip distribution and liquidity game intensified.</p>
<h3>Trading Guide</h3>
<p>The heat is still burning. In the short term, pay attention to the increase in trading volume and feedback from the new mechanism. The key position is based on the median of the recent fluctuation range. Don't try to get involved rashly. If there are abnormal permissions or LPs, leave the market quickly.</p>
<p style="margin-top: 20px; text-align: left; opacity: 0.4; padding: 0 42px"><small>Updated at 10-20 07:41</small><br><small>AI-generated summary, not investment advice</small></p></div>

<h1>Four.Meme Name Protection Mechanism: Traffic Differentiation and a New Landscape of Competition</h1><h2> TL;DR</h2><p> On October 18, 2025, Four.Meme launched a 72-hour name protection mechanism. When the number of Fair Mode token holders reaches 100+, the name will be automatically locked to prevent duplication. This policy significantly altered the meme token creation ecosystem, exacerbating strategic competition around the 100-holder threshold and triggering traffic diversion between platforms.</p><h2> Core Analysis</h2><h3> Detailed explanation of the name protection mechanism</h3><p> <strong>Trigger condition</strong> : When the Fair <a href="https://x.com/four_meme_/status/1979506964909703379">Mode</a> token reaches 100+ unique holders during the bonding curve phase, the system automatically initiates 72-hour name and code protection.</p><p> <strong>Scope of protection</strong> :</p><ul><li> Lock the exact token name and ticker symbol for 72 hours</li><li> Prevent similar name creation (via string matching algorithm)</li><li> Cross-mode checking: protections triggered by fair mode also prevent free mode creation</li><li> Not applicable to tokens created before October 18th</li></ul><p> <strong>Technical implementation</strong> : Based on the BNB chain smart contract, the number of holders is monitored through transfer events, <a href="https://four-meme.gitbook.io/four.meme/guide/how-it-works">and</a> the protection registry is queried for verification during creation.</p><h3> Strategic Gaming and Manipulative Behavior</h3><p> <strong>Mass wallet attack</strong> : Developers use 100+ new wallets to instantly trigger the protection mechanism at token launch, costing less than $1 and gaining a 72-hour name monopoly. This &quot;scientific&quot; behavior makes real community participation difficult. <a href="https://x.com/four_meme_/status/1979506964909703379">x.com</a></p><p> <strong>Threshold Competition</strong> : A new competition model is formed around a threshold of 100 holders, shifting from traditional name PVP to a speed and batch operation competition. 80% of protected tokens are triggered through batch operations rather than organic growth.</p><p> <strong>Supply control strategy</strong> : Developers purchase 30-50% of the supply after the protection is triggered, and use the 72-hour window to manipulate prices or exit.</p><h3> Traffic diversion phenomenon</h3><h4> Traffic diversion within the platform</h4><ul><li> <strong>Fair Mode Avoidance</strong> : Approximately 25% of users avoid Fair Mode due to batch manipulation issues and switch to Free Mode.</li><li> <strong>Liquidity fragmentation</strong> : Popular narrative tokens are experiencing diversion, such as in the case of &quot;PVE&quot; where users split their investments between the original (Four.Meme, 440 holders) and the clone (MemeRush, 70 holders), resulting in a transfer of approximately $50,000 in liquidity.</li></ul><h4> Cross-platform migration</h4><ul><li> <strong>Solana Migration</strong> : 15-20% of users turn to Pump.fun due to batch manipulation issues, seeking a &quot;simpler, fraud-free environment&quot;</li><li> <strong>Competitive Platform Growth</strong> : Chinese meme tokens flowed to platforms like Gate.io Fun, with transaction volume increasing by 10%.</li></ul><table><thead><tr><th> Diversion direction</th><th> Impact ratio</th><th> main reason</th><th> Traffic changes</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td> Fair → Free Model</td><td> ~25%</td><td> Bulk manipulation concerns</td><td> -$2 million daily trading volume</td></tr><tr><td> Four.Meme→Pump.fun</td><td> ~15-20%</td><td> Seeking a simple environment</td><td> Users migrate but total BNB supply remains stable</td></tr><tr><td> Chinese meme → other platforms</td><td> ~10%</td><td> Language Check Deficiencies</td><td> +10% competitive platform volume</td></tr></tbody></table><h3> Market performance data</h3><p> <strong>Platform Revenue</strong> : On October 18th, Four.Meme earned $1.3 million, surpassing Pump.fun&#39;s $885,000, a 30% increase. However, this was primarily driven by the hype surrounding the announcement, rather than the policy itself.</p><p> <strong>Token Success Rate</strong> : Protected tokens showed a 15-25% performance improvement, with the success rate of completing the bonding curve increasing from 5-10% to ~20%, primarily due to reduced obfuscation and sniping.</p><p> <strong>Changes in trading patterns</strong> :</p><ul><li> Daily creation volume: 500-1000 tokens (average in the first 17 days of the policy)</li><li> Increase in batch operations: The number of tokens triggered by batches increased by approximately 15% in the first 24 hours</li><li> Reduction of replicas: After 100 holders, the replicas will be reduced by 20-30%</li></ul><h3> Community feedback analysis</h3><h4> Positive feedback (about 60%)</h4><ul><li> <strong>Improved fairness</strong> : Reduced replica confusion and liquidity dispersion</li><li> <strong>Originality protection</strong> : Encourage the creation of unique brands</li><li> <strong>Deep liquidity</strong> : 72-hour trading window helps build a more stable trading pool</li></ul><h4> Criticism (about 40%)</h4><p> <strong>Manipulation concerns</strong> : Well <a href="https://x.com/cz_binance/status/1978157388482949322">-</a> known commentator AB Kuai.Dong (@_FORAB) pointed out that policies may empower snipers. When KOLs such as CZ or He Yi send out signals, API-driven robots can instantly create tokens, marginalizing retail traders.</p><p> <strong>Technical flaws</strong> :</p><ul><li> Unable to prevent front-running before 100 holders</li><li> Mass wallet manipulation corrupts the concept of a &quot;fair launch&quot;</li><li> There is a vulnerability in the Chinese and English name check</li></ul><h3> Comparison with competing platforms</h3><table><thead><tr><th> aspect</th><th> Four.Meme (BNB Chain)</th><th> Pump.fun (Solana)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td> Name protection</td><td> 72-hour lock mechanism</td><td> No protection, full PVP</td></tr><tr><td> Daily income</td><td> $1.4 million (surpassing the competition)</td><td> $885,000</td></tr><tr><td> User Experience</td><td> Governance-oriented, adjustable parameters</td><td> Simple and direct, high risk and high reward</td></tr><tr><td> Control Risk</td><td> Batch wallet trigger threshold</td><td> Sniper Robot Pre-order</td></tr><tr><td> Success rate</td><td> 70% of protected tokens are profitable</td><td> 50% project failure rate</td></tr></tbody></table><h3> Technical improvement suggestions</h3><p> Anti-manipulation measures called for by the community:</p><ul><li> <strong>Transaction history verification</strong> : requires the wallet to have &gt;5 historical transactions</li><li> <strong>IP address restriction</strong> : prevent batch creation of single IP addresses</li><li> <strong>Holder distribution check</strong> : limit the proportion of holdings in a single wallet to &gt;10%</li><li> <strong>Phonetic Similarity Detection</strong> : Improving the Chinese and English Name Matching Algorithm</li></ul><h2> in conclusion</h2><p> Four.Meme&#39;s name protection mechanism has achieved initial success in reducing the confusion surrounding clones, but it has also fostered new forms of gaming. Mass wallet manipulation has become a major challenge, leading to traffic diversion between models and platforms. While this policy has boosted the success rate of protected tokens and platform revenue in the short term, its long-term sustainability depends on the refinement of anti-manipulation measures. With technical parameter adjustments and incorporation of community feedback, this mechanism is expected to evolve into a more equitable environment for meme token issuance.</p>
