# After the Sonic migration, S's sales plummeted by 90%, and the airdrop strategy failed.
1 KOL Opinions
loading indicator
Loading..
Deep Dives
53
13
Comments
Deep Dives
Powered by Asksurf.ai

Analysis of the Stoll Plunge After the Sonic Migration: The Failure and Reflection on the Airdrop Strategy

Overview

S token price performance : From a peak of $1.03 in January 2025, it fell to $0.18 on November 8th, a drop of 82% (nearly 90%). The current price is $0.1625, a 24-hour increase of 24.54%.

Migration Results : Despite offering $120 million in incentives and a 200 million S token airdrop, Sonic failed to retain users and liquidity, with TVL declining by 46% during October and November.

Migration Timeline and Key Events

Main stages

time event Influence
December 18, 2024 Sonic mainnet launch, FTM:S 1:1 exchange begins Initial migration boom
January 2025 The S token was listed on major exchanges, and its price peaked at $1.03. Short-term speculation drives up prices
March 31, 2025 The two-way exchange window has closed; only FTM→S is supported. Increased migration pressure
November 1, 2025 The second season of the airdrop has ended, with 200 million S tokens distributed. Selling pressure released in a concentrated manner
November 3, 2025 Beets Fi protocol attacked, resulting in a loss of $128 million. Confidence further dampened

The core reason for the price collapse

1. User retention failed.

The migration initially attracted a large amount of speculative capital, but actual user activity remained low. Data shows that Sonic TVL dropped from $250M on October 1 to $136M on November 8, a decrease of 46%.

2. The incentive mechanism is ineffective.

  • The $120 million FTM fund is primarily used for partner incentives and does not directly benefit ordinary users.
  • The 200 million S token airdrop attracted short-term "freebie hunters," but lacked long-term retention. After the airdrop ended, many users chose to sell and leave Blockonomi.

3. Supply shocks and market pressures

The concentrated release of airdropped tokens caused an oversupply, which, coupled with the Beets Fi attack on November 3, further dampened market confidence. DEX trading volume data reflects a continuous outflow of liquidity.

On-chain data analysis

TVL Comparative Analysis

index Sonic (October-November) Fantom (September-October) change
Starting TVL $250M $13.6M +1,739%
Peak TVL $295M $13.6M +2,072%
End TVL $136M $9.6M +1,317%
Period decline -46% -29% Retention deterioration

DEX activity

  • Total trading volume : $780M (October 1 - November 8)
  • Major DEX : Shadow Exchange holds a 62% market share. However, trading volume dropped by 35% after November.
  • User growth : Daily active users increased from 12,000 to 65,000, but declined by 15-30% after November.

Technical Analysis and Market Sentiment

Current technical indicators

  • RSI(14) : 55.02 (rebounding from oversold territory)
  • MACD : Early bullish crossover signal appears
  • Key support : $0.112 (November 4 low)
  • Resistance level : $0.190 (November 8 high)

Futures open interest data shows total open interest at $63.8M (a 64% increase in 24 hours), but funding rates remain negative, reflecting continued bearish sentiment.

Social media sentiment

Community sentiment was predominantly negative, with key viewpoints including:

  • Improper execution of the migration process diluted the interests of the original holders.
  • Airdrops primarily attract short-term speculators and lack ecosystem development.
  • Strong technical capabilities but weak application ecosystem x.com

Reflections on Airdrop Strategies

Failure factors

  1. Design flaw : Prioritizing quantity over quality, failing to screen genuine users.
  2. Inappropriate timing : Overlapping with token unlocking exacerbates selling pressure.
  3. Incentive mismatch : Short-term rewards cannot compensate for insufficient ecosystem applications

Compared to other projects

Compared to successful Layer 1 projects, Sonic lacks:

  • Differentiated application scenarios
  • Sustainable economic models
  • Effective community governance mechanisms

Current Market Situation and Outlook

Recent catalysts

  • Network upgrade : Version 2.1.2 has been delayed, but the network is running stably at x.com.
  • Security Improvements : Security mechanisms upgraded in response to the Beets Fi attack.
  • Market rebound : A 40% intraday rebound occurred on November 8th, but more fundamental support is needed.

Risk Warning

  • Token unlocking pressure continues
  • The highly competitive Layer 1 track
  • Macroeconomic market fluctuations

in conclusion

Sonic's migration case highlights the gap between technological upgrades and user retention in crypto projects. Despite its technological advantage of 400K TPS and generous incentives, it failed to build sustainable ecosystem value, ultimately leading to a price crash.

Key takeaway : Successful blockchain projects require not only technological innovation, but also:

  • Effective user retention mechanisms
  • Differentiated application ecosystem
  • Sustainable economic models
  • Precise incentive design

The current price of $0.16 may be near a bottom, but lacking strong fundamental catalysts, a sustained rebound is unlikely in the short term. Investors should focus on the project's substantial progress in ecosystem development and user retention.

Ask Surf More