# HOPPY listed on Solana, and the wallet behind WOLF launched its first new coin in two years.
9 KOL Opinions
loading indicator
Loading..
Deep Dives
52
12
Comments
Deep Dives
Powered by Asksurf.ai

HOPPY launches on Solana — Strong narrative, but validation still insufficient.

In conclusion: the core trading logic of this wave (2024111120230) is not fundamental, but rather the Matt Furie/2024111120231 universe narrative combined with the social media catalyst of "the wallet/team behind $WOLF returning." The retrieved on-chain and transaction pages show that $HOPPY's Solana CA is 2RWndXkxWkaKhGjE7dZivVbK5qXtpwnCZJ1jpnxapump , and the Pump.fun page shows it has graduated with a market capitalization of approximately $1.43M ; the GMGN page shows a market capitalization of approximately $1.35M , a 24-hour trading volume of $5.5M–$6.4M , and approximately 4,854 holders. The key risk is that the claim of "$WOLF 240M ATH / a new coin launched in two years" currently mainly comes from the project team and KOLs' narratives and cannot be considered a fully verified on-chain fact.

Key conclusions

This is an early Solana meme driven by a narrative. The promotional points for $HOPPY are clear: both official accounts and KOLs emphasize that it's an early frog character from Matt Furie, shares a narrative origin with $PEPE, and packages it as an "OG Furie frog" on Solana. The project's official account also posted that "we've made $WOLF 240M, but have bigger plans for $HOPPY . "

The CA and underlying transaction pages can be confirmed. The Pump.fun page displays $HOPPY Contract 2RWndXkxWkaKhGjE7dZivVbK5qXtpwnCZJ1jpnxapump , the page title gives a market capitalization of approximately $1.43M , and indicates that the project has graduated from the bonding curve. Pump.fun

However, the claim that "$WOLF's wallet launched two years ago" needs to be examined in layers. The GMGN page shows dev/creator information, token creation/pool creation time, and the number of Dev Tokens; social media KOLs further claim that the wallet is related to $WOLF / LANDWOLF and hasn't deployed any new coins in over two years. Here, I'll categorize this as a "retrieved narrative clue" rather than a "fully confirmed on-chain attribution." GMGN

Data snapshot

Searchable market data indicates: market capitalization is still small, trading is already active, and holders are spreading rapidly. Pump.fun and GMGN show a market capitalization in the $1.35M–$1.43M range, belonging to a very early-stage meme platform. The GMGN page also shows a 24-hour volume of approximately $5.5M , and the short-term trading range on the page shows a significant 24-hour increase, indicating that investor attention has moved from a "cold start" stage to a "social media spread + high-frequency turnover" stage. GMGN

Data source: Pump.fun / GMGN page snapshot; the same metric may vary due to different page refresh times and calculation methods.

index Data retrieved source Read
Chain Solana Pump.fun Confirmed
CA 2RWnd...pump Pump.fun Confirmed
Market capitalization $1.35M–$1.43M GMGN / Pump.fun Small-cap early stage
24-hour trading volume Approximately $5.5M+ GMGN High popularity
Holders Approximately 4,854 GMGN In the process of spreading
Liquidity Approximately $105.5K GMGN Thin
Top 10 Approximately 11.72% GMGN Medium concentration
Mint / Blacklist NoMint / No Blacklist GMGN Low contract risk

The contract security is relatively clean, but liquidity remains a hard constraint. The GMGN page displays risk items such as NoMint, No Blacklist, and Burnt / 100%, which are necessary but not sufficient conditions for the Solana meme. What truly affects trading is the $105K level of liquidity corresponding to a $1M+ market capitalization , where the risks of slippage, market crashes, and KOL withdrawal are all relatively high.

Wallet clues

Both the project team and KOLs are promoting the "$WOLF linked wallet" narrative. The official account claims, "We've achieved 240M for $WOLF"; several Chinese KOLs subsequently relayed that $HOPPY is deployed by the same wallet behind $WOLF / LANDWOLF, and that this wallet hasn't deployed any new coins in over two years. A representative example is ChinaWhaleETH's post on 2026-05-26 at 03:42 UTC mentioning CA and the "same wallet deployment" narrative.

The searchable page supports "dev/creator association" but not fully supports "240M ATH". The GMGN page displays Dev Token as 2 and Dev's Best Token as $WOLF , but $WOLF ATH MC shown on the page is $4M , which is significantly different from the $240M spread on social media; this indicates that "$WOLF 240M" may refer to another $WOLF, another statistical method, or an exaggeration in social media narrative, and cannot be directly incorporated into the pricing assumption. GMGN

statement Searched status evidence Credibility
HOPPY is now available on Solana. Searched Pump.fun / GMGN high
The official CA is 2RWnd...pump Searched Pump.fun / X high
The official claim is that they have done $WOLF Searched OfficialHoppy X Medium and high
$WOLF ATH $240M Social Media Statement Official/KOL copywriting medium to low
Two years since the first new coin was launched Social Media Statement KOL + dev page leads middle
Deployment of the same wallet Partial Search GMGN dev information middle

My approach: Treat "WOLF wallet return" as a narrative catalyst, not as an audited fact. For memes, this kind of narrative is enough to drive short-term gains, but if it's used as a basis for medium-term positions, further verification is needed regarding dev address history, early funding, old contracts, deployment timelines, and ATH data standards.

Trading perspective

In the short term, $HOPPY's advantages are its easy-to-tell narrative, rapid social media spread, and relatively small market capitalization. Matt Furie / $PEPE / $WOLF This line is very easy for meme traders to spread, and its current market capitalization is still in the $1M+ range, possessing the flexibility of a "low-market-cap narrative platform." The official account has approximately 702 followers, indicating that its official reach is still small, currently relying more on KOLs and Chinese/English meme circles for dissemination.

The risks are also evident: intensive dissemination but insufficient hard verification. Current tweets repeatedly mention "$WOLF 240M / LANDWOLF deployer / first launch in two years," but there are inconsistencies between the information on the searchable trading page and the social media text; if this is subsequently proven false by the market, the narrative premium will quickly retreat. Another risk is the thin liquidity; a $100K pool supports a market capitalization of over $1M , and large inflows and outflows will significantly impact the price.

A more reliable observation point is not "whether to buy," but rather three confirmation lines. First, see if holders continue to expand from 4,854 and the Top 10 does not rise; second, see if liquidity can continue to increase from $105K ; third, see if the official team or on-chain detectives provide verifiable mappings for the old deployment wallets, old contracts, and devs.

in conclusion

$HOPPY is currently a typical early-stage Solana meme opportunity: strong narrative, high elasticity, weak validation, and low liquidity . For short-term trading, the key tracking factors are the speed of social media spread, whether GMGN/Pump data continues to increase, and whether devs/holders experience abnormal selling pressure. For larger positions, on-chain attribution validation of the "wallet behind $WOLF" line must be performed first.

Bottom line. $HOPPY's CA is 2RWndXkxWkaKhGjE7dZivVbK5qXtpwnCZJ1jpnxapump (Solana); it can currently be regarded as a highly volatile early meme driven by Matt Furie + $WOLF narrative , but "$WOLF 240M / two-year first release" should still be marked as a social media narrative and cannot be regarded as a fully confirmed on-chain fact.

Ask Surf More