The potential of social media is incredible - you have so much potential to explore the evidence of something and then come to an enlightened opinion a bit later. This is called rationality.
The reality is that this is short-circuited by a rush to judgement... any investigation that might run counter to the accepted narrative is condemned as 'leftist' etc. Sheer madness.😒

Twitter

社群媒体的潜力是巨大的——你可以利用它去探索事物的证据，然后再过一段时间形成自己深刻的观点。这叫做理性。
现实情况是，这种草率的判断阻碍了整个过程……任何可能与既定叙事相悖的调查都会被谴责为「左翼」等等。简直是疯了。 😒

1 月 9 日，代币化现实世界资产达到 197.2 亿美元，这是该市场最接近 200 亿美元Threshold的一次。
该数字衡量的是分布式资产，即在网络上流通的代币……

代币化国债价格飙升125%，形成了一种“可编程现金”循环，各大银行正争相效仿。

当市场为创新速度焦虑时，往往忽略了以太坊最核心的不可复制资产——一套不可妥协的价值观。

穿透 Ethereum“退化”喧嚣：为什么“以太坊价值观”是最宽的护城河？

根据一项新的技术分析，比特币价格已回落至其“崩盘线”，引发了人们对价格可能出现牛市反弹的猜测。但撰写该分析的专家认为，这并非……

比特币价格触及崩盘线，但这次并非偶然。

Of course, when you are investigating at the start, when you have yet to come to a conclusion, you have to entertain various ideas... and then rule them out in a process.
This does not generally happen on social media because people do not want to appear wrong on something.... but that is part and parcel of the process.
For example, my suggestion of an innocent U-turn would be invalidated by finding out they were protesters... and had been involved with protest earlier.
This would go to further explain the situation, where further questions would be raised - was this personal? Were the ICE agents familiar with these women from previous incidents?

当然，在调查初期，在得出结论之前，你必须考虑各种可能性……然后逐一排除。

这种情况在社交媒体上通常不会发生，因为人们不想在某件事上显得自己错了……但这却是调查过程的一部分。

例如，我之前提出的“无意掉头”的说法，如果发现她们是抗议者……而且之前也参与过抗议活动，那么这个说法就站不住脚了。

这会进一步解释当时的情况，并引发更多疑问——这是否与个人有关？移民执法局（ICE）的探员是否在之前的事件中认识这些女性？