I read the paper, to the best of my ability.
I'm willing to entertain the idea that we have a genuine QC threat on the cards.
At a minimum, it would be a mistake to not take it seriously, and start developing a formal PCQ plan for Bitcoin.
Having a plan, and not needing it, is far better than the other way around.

Many are wondering "what Google saw" that caused them to revise their post-quantum cryptography transition deadline to 2029 last week. It was this:
https://research.google/blog/safeguarding-cryptocurrency-by-disclosing-quantum-vulnerabilities-responsibly/…

nic carter

Twitter

我已尽我所能阅读了这份文件。

我愿意考虑我们确实面临品质控制威胁的可能性。

至少，如果我们不认真对待这个问题，并开始为比特币制定正式的程序化品质控制（PCQ）计划，那就大错特错了。

制定计划而不必动用它，远胜于事后才发现需要动用它。

Block 旗下的比特币项目比特币 at Block（Block 由 Twitter联创杰克·多西创立）刚刚宣布上线免费比特币水龙头，标记比特币分发模式的回归……

杰克·多西宣布了一项价值 100 万镁的项目，旨在免费赠送比特币。

微策略（Strategy）创办人 Michael Saylor 断言比特币已赢得全球叙事战，同时点名 BIP- […]
〈Michael Saylor 警告 BIP-110 是比特币最大威胁；四年周期已死、机构资本才是真主角〉这篇文章最早发布于动区BlockTempo《动区动趋-最具影响力的区块链新闻媒体》。

Michael Saylor 警告 BIP-110 是比特币最大威胁；四年周期已死、机构资本才是真主角

根据链上数据显示， Chainlink已按计划按季度解锁 1787.5 万枚 LINK 代币，价值约 1.65 亿美元。
在新增的供应量中，有 1487.5 万枚 LINK，……

Chainlink代币大规模解锁引发抛售担忧

The one question I can't help but ask, is the following;
This paper, if I understand it correctly, is Google saying we have cracked the design for a cryptographically relevant quantum computer.
That's a very big deal.
Why oh why, did they focus the paper on our blockchain bags?
Not government codes. Not banking infrastructure, Not internet protocols.
Internet funny money.
By no means disqualifying, but certainly an odd think to be the topic of interest for such a discovery.

我忍不住要问一个问题：

如果我理解没错的话，这篇论文是谷歌宣布他们已经破解了与密码学相关的量子计算机的设计。

这可是件大事。

为什么他们偏偏要把论文的重点放在我们的区块链上呢？

不是政府代码，不是银行基础设施，也不是互联网协议。

而是互联网上的虚拟货币。

这当然不是什么大问题，但对于这样一项发现来说，这确实有点奇怪。